I wonder just like any one else if the prehistoric people especially the guys had engaged themselves in some sort of homosexual activities?
2007-09-02 18:45:12 · 16 answers · asked by bel m 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Homosexuality is not a modern practice. It was found to be practiced in Babylonian and Greek cultures of 5000-6000 yrs ago. It is also found in animal behavior so it must have existed in "prehistoric" people.
2007-09-02 18:52:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure they had such an entirely different concept of sex than we do today. Who knows what their practices were like. It would be interesting to find out though.
I imagine it did exist. It exists in other animals so there's no reason to assume they didn't. I don't know what they would have thought about it, if it they'd consider it taboo or not.
Why assume it was just mostly guys though? Women don't get to have any fun?
2007-09-02 19:00:06 · answer #2 · answered by Lillith 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I would think that is a given. Look around at mammals today, dogs, cats, cows, monkeys.... all humping around like crazy. Birds and water mammals as well. I'm sure the cavemen did whatever came naturally in their society. In fact, they were probably very much like chimps in their society which means they engaged in sex for fun, sex for pleasure, and sex as a means to mend arguments, with little or no thought as to who it was with. Really, if they had a culture similar to primate culture, the young and weaker males probably were exclusively homosexual unless they could catch a female off in the bushes or something.
2007-09-02 18:52:04 · answer #3 · answered by CB 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well I do not know but I would say yes it probably did exist. I mean we have ancient sources talking about it, the bible, there are some in Greek and Roman writings. So I would say that it did exist back them some just as it does today.
2007-09-02 18:51:18 · answer #4 · answered by Prof. Dave 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Given that you'll find m/m and f/f boinking among members of pretty much all animal species, particularly large social mammals (like primates), I'd say yes. I don't see any reason to assume proto-humans differed from any other higher primates in that regard.
2007-09-03 07:47:24 · answer #5 · answered by Mike 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no scientific proof of prehistoric gay weddings, but homosexuality exists innature. So, its safe to assume that it did happen.
2007-09-02 22:53:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sexual contact between men has existed for as long as there have been two men. It is only recently that it is distinguished by a name: homosexuality.
Love between men is recorded to the beginning of recorded history.
Not necessarily accurate, an affair between twin brothers is enacted in the super movie "Quest for Fire".
2007-09-02 18:55:47 · answer #7 · answered by San Diego Art Nut 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
of path it does. circulate to a GOP campaign party in San Francisco and see for your self. i become stunned when I observed what share there have been...they have been propose too, decrease back in 2004 whilst myself and my punk associates raided Bush's campaign party over on the SF GOP Headquarters.
2016-11-14 01:28:16 · answer #8 · answered by weberg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wonder away. There are no records of any of those humanoids other than fossile ones and they aren't going to give us a clue in that direction.
2007-09-02 19:01:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is known to happen throughout the Animal Kingdom, so there is no reason to think that early humans avoided it.
2007-09-02 18:49:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋