English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-02 13:45:47 · 10 answers · asked by Ray P 1 in Politics & Government Government

10 answers

A series of bitter political quarrels between President Johnson and Radical Republicans in Congress over Reconstruction policy in the South eventually led to his impeachment.

Radical Republicans wanted to enact a sweeping transformation of southern social and economic life, permanently ending the old planter class system, and favored granting freed slaves full-fledged citizenship including voting rights.

The Radicals included such notable figures as Representative Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania and Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts. Most Radicals had been associated with the Abolitionist movement before the Civil War.

After the war, they came to believe whites in the South were seeking to somehow preserve the old slavery system under a new guise. They observed an unrepentant South featuring new state governments full of ex-Confederates passing repressive labor laws and punitive Black Codes targeting freed slaves.

Black Codes in Mississippi prohibited freedmen from testifying against whites, allowed unemployed blacks to be arrested for vagrancy and hired out as cheap labor, and mandated separate public schools. Blacks were also prohibited from serving on juries, bearing arms or holding large gatherings.

When the U.S. Congress convened on December 4, 1865, representatives sent from the South included the former vice president of the Confederacy, Alexander Stephens of Georgia, along with four ex-Confederate generals, eight colonels, six cabinet members and numerous lesser known Rebels. Northern congressmen, furious upon realizing this, omitted the southerners from the roll call and thus denied seats in Congress to all representatives from the eleven former Confederate states.

Radical Republican views gathered momentum in Congress and were in the majority by the end of 1865. In April of 1866, Congress enacted a Civil Rights Act in response to southern Black Codes. The Act granted new rights to native-born blacks, including the right to testify in court, to sue, and to buy property. President Johnson vetoed the Act claiming it was an invasion of states' rights and would cause "discord among the races." Congress overrode the veto by a single vote. This marked the beginning of an escalating power struggle between the President and Congress that would eventually lead to impeachment.

Bitter personal attacks also occurred with Johnson labeled as a "drunken imbecile" and "ludicrous boor," while the President called Radicals "factious, domineering, tyrannical" men. Unfortunately for Johnson, he had appeared drunk in public during his vice presidential inauguration. Weakened by a fever at the time, he had taken brandy to fortify himself but wound up incoherent and lambasted several high ranking dignitaries who were present.

In June of 1866, Congress passed the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guaranteeing civil liberties for both native-born and naturalized Americans and prohibiting any state from depriving citizens of life, liberty, or property, without due process. The Amendment granted the right to vote to all males twenty-one and older. Johnson opposed the Amendment on the grounds it did not apply to southerners who were without any representation in Congress. Tennessee was the only southern state to ratify the Amendment. The others, encouraged in part by Johnson, refused.

Amid increasing newspaper reports of violence against blacks in the South, moderate voters in the North began leaning toward the Radicals. Johnson made matters worse by attempting to join all moderates in a new political party, the National Union Party, to counter the Radicals. To drum up support, he went on a nationwide speaking tour, but his gruff, uncouth behavior toward his political opponents alienated those who heard him and left many with the impression that Johnson's true supporters were mainly ex-Rebels. As a result, the Radicals swept the elections of November 1866, resulting in a two-thirds anti-Johnson majority in both the House and Senate.

With this majority, three consecutive vetoes by Johnson were overridden by Congress in 1867, thus passing the Military Reconstruction Act, Command of the Army Act, and Tenure of Office Act against his wishes.

The Military Reconstruction Act divided the South into five military districts under federal control and imposed strict requirements on southern states in order for them to be re-admitted to the Union including ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and new state constitutions in conformity with the U.S. Constitution.

The other two Acts limited Johnson's power to interfere with Congressional Reconstruction. The Command of the Army Act required Johnson to issue all military orders through the General of the Army (at that time General Ulysses S. Grant) instead of dealing directly with military governors in the South. The Tenure of Office Act required the consent of the Senate for the President to remove an officeholder whose appointment had been originally confirmed by the Senate.

Many in Congress wanted to keep Radical sympathizer, Secretary of War, Edwin M. Stanton, in Johnson's cabinet. The political feud between the President and Congress climaxed as Johnson sought to oust Stanton in violation of the Tenure of Office Act.

During a cabinet meeting in early August, Stanton had informed the President that the five military governors in the South were now answerable to Congress and not to the President and that the new military chain of command passed from the Commander of the Army through the House of Representatives.

On August 12, 1867, an outraged Johnson suspended Stanton and named General Ulysses S. Grant to replace him. However, the Senate refused to confirm Johnson's action. Grant then voluntarily relinquished the office back to Stanton.

On February 21, 1868, challenging the constitutionality of the Tenure of Office Act, Johnson continued his defiance of Congress and named General Lorenzo Thomas as the new Secretary of War and also ordered the military governors to report directly to him. This time Stanton refused to budge and even barricaded himself inside his office.

Three days later, the House of Representatives voted impeachment on a party-line vote of 126�47 on the vague grounds of "high crimes and misdemeanors," with the specific charges to be drafted by a special committee.

The special committee drafted eleven articles of impeachment which were approved a week later. Articles 1-8 charged President Johnson with illegally removing Stanton from office. Article 9 accused Johnson of violating the Command of the Army Act. The last two charged Johnson with libeling Congress through "inflammatory and scandalous harangues."

2007-09-02 13:53:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Why Did Johnson Get Impeached

2017-01-16 11:25:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

President Johnson was impeached largely over his suspension of the secretary of war Edwin Stanton.

This link should help you answer any questions about this trial.

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/impeach/impeachmt.htm

Briefly, a radical arm of the Republican Party was trying to affect the reconstruction of the south after the civil war. President Lincoln had a plan to bring the south back into the union without extracting punitive payments for the war. The radical republicans had a different agenda but could not push through legislation while Lincoln was in office. When President Johnson took office they saw a chance. Johnson was a southerner by birth but a union loyalist in practice he remained so throughout the war.

Stanton’s harsh punishment of the south was against Lincoln’s policy and the Johnson administrations continuance of that policy. The radical Republicans supported Stanton and knew that Johnson was going to remove him from office. Specific legislation was enacted to keep the President from removing Stanton.

President Johnson waited until congress recessed and then removed Johnson from office and replaced him with Ulysses S Grant. This breach of constitutional duties was cause for impeachment in the thinking of the Republicans. The house voted articles of impeachment and presented their case before the senate. However, the senate vote fell short of the two thirds needed to remove Johnson and he remained in office.

2007-09-02 14:19:31 · answer #3 · answered by jnower 2 · 0 0

the House of Representatives voted to impeach President Johnson. Congress wanted Johnson impeached because he refused to cooperate or compromise over black rights and the reconstruction of Southern state governments. But under the Constitution, Congress had to charge him with "high crimes or misdemeanors." Most of the charges related to his violating the Tenure of Office Act by firing Stanton. The constitutionality of this law was questionable and had never been tested in the courts. It was a weak reason to remove a president.

2007-09-02 13:51:52 · answer #4 · answered by Sal*UK 7 · 2 0

Violation of the Tenure of Office Act--he removed Sec of Stanton over the wishes and direction of Congress. He defied the Congressional will in other words.

Prior to that, Congress was gunning for Johnson for refusing to implement various Reconstruction laws including the Civil Rights Act.

Johnson constantly defied Congress and they felt he was therefore a lawless President.

2007-09-02 13:54:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If your referring to Lyndon Banes Johnson , The 36Th President of the United States of America,you are wrong on that Question. President Johnson was not willing to seek a second term as our President for various reasons . I think the most important issue in his decision not to run for a second term was mainly the war in Vietnam . That war cost us over 58,000 American life's and over 600,000 wounded for nothing but playing a Political chess game with human life's that left families without Sons ,Daughters , husbands,wife's and most important the children having to grow up not knowing their real father and or mother who paid the ultimate price. Is Iraq going to be another police action like Vietnam became ? Unfortunately it seems like the same scenario is possible if this outline plays out the same. God Forbid if it does.

2007-09-02 15:54:45 · answer #6 · answered by David 3 · 0 0

Andrew Johnson was impeached, but acquitted of the charges. Impeached does not mean removed from office; it means having to stand trial.

2007-09-02 13:53:20 · answer #7 · answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5 · 1 0

High crimes and misdemeanors.

2007-09-02 14:03:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont think he did
nixon did

2007-09-02 13:50:40 · answer #9 · answered by fishshogun 5 · 0 1

he didn't

2007-09-02 13:52:15 · answer #10 · answered by 007 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers