If a boss oe employer refuses you a job as you have dreadlocks or coloured hair or a goth, of have tattoss etc.
You and mates hold them down, tattoo their face so they have goth like features or a tattoo. Shave their head and superglue or stitch into their head things like plantic neon green hair extentions
Ie if they have a problem with your coloured hair or tattooos or alternative looks in general...
Why it it not allowed for you to turn them so they look alternative and then they get saked for not looking right and refused a job and see how they like it.
Similar principle to turning a a white racsit back for a while and sticking him someahere away from friends
Whilst at it.
If bosses sack you or otherwise attack your work place relationship why cant you break up their family or marriage.
Or if they exploit sweat shop labour.
Kidnap them take them to a sweat shop where can speak the language and see how they like it.
And their kids too
2007-09-02
13:12:55
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
so they understand where their nice toys and dads money comes from...
And how their daddy likes having kids and other peope mistreated and made to work four 4p an hour etc.
So wont like daddy anymore
2007-09-02
13:15:14 ·
update #1
**********
Quote
Yeah,why is that not legal? Gee, I dunno.
Actually I dont I operate on the fairs fair principle of ethics
2007-09-02
13:19:32 ·
update #2
QUOTE
umm doing the first thing is a really dumb thing to do and you could be arrested for assault
and the second thing is just as dumb and is again available for arrest for assault because you shouldn't do that to people and if this happened to you i would strongly suggest a counselor
Why should you be arrested? they were mean to you and others of your kind say rocker, ravers, hippies, metallyer etc.
Plus surely its dumb to refuse a qualified, capable and willing person.
Simply as dont like their hairstyle or individual look?
And is it not dumber to keep said people unemployed getting bitter and angry at unfair treatment?
2007-09-02
13:21:35 ·
update #3
So surely assault is justified so they get to understand what it feels like to be misjudged.
As said same principle in colouring a racists black or Asian
And surely they deserve it if they mess up peoples lives so they can't pay bills.
I mean nobody denied a job or mistreated them for wearing a stupid suit or having a short back and sides haircut.
People should be employed on ability to do a job thats what professional is
2007-09-02
13:24:19 ·
update #4
Well, it's also not legal to not hire someone because of their race, gender, religion etc...
So why not extend it to having blue or green coloured spikey hair or dreds or really creative stuff.? or tattoos
2007-09-02
13:25:21 ·
update #5
quote
it is also not right to terrorise people. So this is the reason it is illegal.
But surely if terrorised then they would not do it again. better still if made to look like you then may bget mistreated by others so learn with it feels like.
2007-09-02
13:42:31 ·
update #6