2007-09-02 13:12:47 · 15 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
boricua_lilly (below) Sorry for expressing freedom of speech. Understand how Bush supporters don't like that.
2007-09-02 13:21:02 · update #1
Actually, he didn't do a better job. In fact, he welcomed them in, allowing them to train at his chemical defense base in Nasiriyah. Additionally, Zarqawi was in Iraq well prior to the US led invasion.
So, your question is not really a question at all, but a rant disguised as a question.
2007-09-03 02:07:07 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 7⤋
Both Saddam and Bush are good example of very bad leaders. They obviously misled their countries and civilians for many years.
Saddam did far better job at keeping Al-Quada out of Iraq because Bush has no businesses invading Iraq in 2003.
2007-09-02 20:51:28 · answer #2 · answered by Hope 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Saddam definitely did a great job in keeping Al Qaeda out of Iraq.
I think Bush went into Iraq hoping to find Al Qaeda there, and sure enough they appear in Iraq years after we tore the country up.
2007-09-02 20:23:39 · answer #3 · answered by DethNcarnate 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
He ruled his land with an iron fist. Maybe Bush should do that in Iraq too and see how long the problems continue. Lock down from now til I say it's over. No democracy, since you cant handle it, we're returning things to the way they were before.
2007-09-02 20:20:14 · answer #4 · answered by eldude 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Lets see.
Saddam was successful at keeping them out of iraq.
Bush has failed miserably.
Saddam was also able to maintain a secular iraq - though he had to rule with an iron fist.
Bush has allowed chaos to descend on iraq, and a civil war to break out.
Saddam was a brutal dictator, and needed to be taken out.
Bush did everything wrong that he possibly could have.
Bush = failure.
2007-09-02 20:35:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
That's what being an outsider will do for you. We don't understand their culture or what motivates them and Saddam though not part of Al-Q was at least a muslim and I'm sure it's understood where they (extremists) are welcome and where they are not. What is getting scary is now even in Pakistan's parliament they are talking about Jihad against America. Bush has screwed us up big time.
2007-09-02 20:20:03 · answer #6 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 9⤊ 1⤋
Saddam had things under control and believe or not Iraqis were lot more happier and satisfied with that life compare to what bush has brought to them!
PS, it's unbelievable how rep's try so hard convincing people otherwise! pure brainwashed!
2007-09-03 15:49:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
That's easy .....Saddam had experience ruling people and controlling situations. Aunt George is not the " LEADERSHIP " type." He is lining his pockets with Oil Profits and Taxpayers money.
2007-09-02 20:32:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes he certainly was the lesser of two evils.
2007-09-02 21:03:54 · answer #9 · answered by molly 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The people of Iraq were much better off under Saddam than with their present quest for a free and independent Iraq.
Get a grip.
2007-09-02 20:25:05 · answer #10 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 8⤋