1) Iraq buying uranium in Niger
2) Iraq was involved in the attack on 9-11
3) Iraq had mobile chemical weapons labs
4) Iraq had aluminum tubes to process uranium
5) Iraq was developing long range ballistic missiles
6) Smoking gun/mushroom cloud
7) More...
2007-09-02 11:04:18 · 19 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
woody_allen324 (below) Yes. True conservatives are NOT neoconservatives (neo-cons)
Jeremy R. (below) Focus and address the points listed above.
2007-09-02 11:12:12 · update #1
Daisy (below) "...believe the conspiracy theories"
Actually no. Neo-cons believe in the CT that Iraq was involved with 9-11. The fact that Bush lied is not a CT. It is a realiTy.
2007-09-02 11:19:40 · update #2
==========
Jeremy R AND Dee B (below) Suggest viewing follow up post:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AplmloLVR6e.itxstrQb6CbY7BR.?qid=20070902154454AAqU7Ur
==========
2007-09-02 11:52:24 · update #3
Neo-cons will never accept responsibility for a fiasco. With every press interview they say, Iraq is showing progress.
2007-09-02 11:08:31 · answer #1 · answered by tanzer360 5 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Do you even know what Neo-Conservatism is? I'm not a 'Neo-Con', however it gets quite annoying when anyone, whether you're on the Left or not, claims that anyone who is right of center is a 'Neo-Con'. Yeesh.
However 1) 4) & 5) are correct. I'm not sure of the other ones.
2007-09-02 18:09:17 · answer #2 · answered by Austrian Theorist 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
-- Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945
Too many ordinary conservatives are brainwashed twenty four seven by their own media outlets like fox news and hate radio.They live in a separate reality where the cons are still gonna win and you and me are enemies.Where the war is good and was worth it,where Bush kept America safe and Clinton is to blame for 9/11.A reality where evolution is a scam and creationism is real science.Where the cooperate media is somehow liberally biased cause they sometimes,once in a while, dare to question the disastrous actions of the pseudo Christian in the white house and his failed administration.
Anyone who doesn't follow their far right idea's is not a political opponent but an enemy to be defeated just like the next yihadi.
2007-09-02 18:12:27 · answer #3 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Are people still bringing up questions about this same old drawn out topic? Neo-cons?!... Where do all these stupid names come from anyways? Did you just find out some information about Iraq and got excited because you could post a question on the Internet? If you want to live in the past then that's up to you...but as far as I'm concerned its the future that we should be thinking about. Get it?...good...
2007-09-02 18:14:17 · answer #4 · answered by Stephen N 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Oh wow!!! Some of those are the same things that the Clinton's said too. So if you believe that Bush and his crew lied then you must believe that the Clinton's lied too. Boy for a liberal you have some guts man. Saying that Bill and Hillery Clinton are liars!!!! Great job!!!
2007-09-02 18:24:44 · answer #5 · answered by Lucius Vorenus 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Funny, but wasn't it the NY Times that revealed Hussein's Iraq had the knowledge, the materials and the plans to make a nuclear weapon?
Nut roots like you always whine and scream, no matter what happens.
PS: It is not a conspiracy theory that Iraq was involved with 9-11.
2007-09-02 18:14:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
It's just way to awful for them to admit that Bush screwed up that bad. So they live in denial. Very sad. Bush supporters are pathetic.
2007-09-02 18:38:58 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because he did'nt lie, Saddam had WMDs and he smuggled them into Iran and Syria.
"1) Iraq buying uranium in Niger - True.
2) Iraq was involved in the attack on 9-11 - Most likely.
3) Iraq had mobile chemical weapons labs - True.
4) Iraq had aluminum tubes to process uranium - True.
5) Iraq was developing long range ballistic missiles - Already had them.
6) Smoking gun/mushroom cloud - N/A.
7) More... Refer to beginning statement.
2007-09-02 18:09:31 · answer #8 · answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Why would it be important for us to agree with you about this web of lies? You have decided to believe the conspiracy theories. If you are so firm in your beliefs, then why do you you need our approval? You must not be very secure with the information you've been given.
2007-09-02 18:15:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It's not that they deny, it's just not a point of conversation for them.
We went there, we are there now...how can we "win".
It is unfortunate that they refuse to ask the deep, meaningful questions. But they do follow their leaders. Those of us who do ask questions are unpatriotic and terrorists.
2007-09-02 18:10:59 · answer #10 · answered by powhound 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋