healthy eating, but put red meat back in only because the meat lobbies complained.
2007-09-02 10:56:44 · 10 answers · asked by JiveMan 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Easy answer, Politics. That's why all the Large Companies take care of the politicians , What good is all that cattle that they have if you oppose beef!
2007-09-02 11:06:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I will ban the masses fom consuming meat when I take power. We need to reduce the testosterone level of the typical American conservative, free-thinking, racist, bigotted homophobic potential-rapist male by doing away with meat. Only when men are vegetarians and can be effectively castrated can this country move toward a pacifist-socialist paradigm.
2007-09-02 11:31:30 · answer #2 · answered by Hillary Clinton 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first of all, i'm not partial to beef. yet in small quantities, decrease fat (lean) beef is a healthful source of protein. the subject lies greater in the actuality that many people could quite eat a 10 ounce or perhaps greater piece of steak, than the counseled 3 oz.! So it isn't the beef itself that is undesirable, however the way maximum folk eat it.
2016-10-17 12:39:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democracy = sold to the highest bidder. Or at least that is how our democracy has turned out. Republican, Democrat, Independent....they take millions of dollars from political action groups (i.e., corporations) and pay them back by passing or not passing bills.
It is nothing more than legalized corruption.
2007-09-02 11:15:19 · answer #4 · answered by wooper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you will just go to the Holy Bible and eat the foods God created and said you could eat ,you would be healthy. And stay away from the foods he said you could not eat because they were unclean.The Government wants us all sick, so we need their so called medication. big bucks in that.
2007-09-02 11:24:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, but when the government tells me what I can and can't eat we are going to have a real problem...Ted Nugent for Prez!
2007-09-02 11:02:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was the Veggan Liberals that lobbied to get it off
2007-09-02 11:11:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
$ame rea$on$ the government backed off on recommendation$ for $ugar con$umption.
2007-09-02 11:02:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Repeating yourself does not add truth.
2007-09-02 11:09:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please keep asking this question, atleast 4-5 more times. WTF
2007-09-02 11:05:27 · answer #10 · answered by jon_mac_usa_007 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋