Most likely it would be me because I could live with the personal misery and shame that it would cost me to allow my children better living conditions, education and for my extended family to have relief from personal financial misery. My now ex-husband would not be able to see beyond the fact there was another male present.
Maybe not the most ethical or Christian answer, and I really had to think about this but this is honestly what I think I might do.
2007-09-02 18:14:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by dizzkat 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Okay. It only took me a week to stop laughing at this question.
Obviously, as I am unpartnered, they'd choose me.
However, I don't need/want their money.
I don't chose partners based on looks or money.
2007-09-02 14:36:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by diannegoodwin@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither. well, would you and your spouse happen to be this couple ? I'll send him right over......
2007-09-02 11:14:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lavender 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, since I have no spouse..
ME!
2007-09-02 10:33:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scotty 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell, they can have both of us at the same time for that kind of money!
2007-09-02 10:37:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Voice of Reason Is Silenced 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you the man? Ill be right over!!!
2007-09-02 15:14:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by § dreamer § 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would be, I don't have a spouse.
2007-09-02 10:24:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
im 13. god damnit!
i dont have a spouse.
but me.
i get to be layedd.
:D
nahh, jkkk.
2007-09-02 10:37:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Phoebe is awsomee. 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
for that much i think either one would be willing
2007-09-02 10:34:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by non_stopangel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ME, and I get to keep all the money! woot woot!
2007-09-02 10:23:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋