2007-09-02 09:06:04 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm not going to vote for her. I don't think she'd make a good president.
2007-09-02 10:58:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, I have to say that there's no way it could get worse than it is now, lol! If you're a Republican, you'll probably hate me for it or thumb me down, but in my humble opinion, the one in the White House now is the worst disaster in American government history.
It's always hard to tell just how good/bad a potential President will be before he/she is actually elected. They tell us what we want to hear so they can get the votes, and after that, well it all depends on their self conscious if they follow through or not.
Personally, I think that Hillary already has some experience from her husband's former position. That can't hurt her. I have faith in her that she'll do quite a good job, but of course everyone has their own theories. I guess we'll all watch and see. My mind isn't totally made up yet, so I'll have to keep watching to get each candidate's stories.
2007-09-02 18:08:17 · answer #2 · answered by hayaa_bi_taqwa 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only way we will ever get rid of the Clintons once and for all is hope she wins so that she can create a disaster as president.then maybe the both of them will fade away into a cloud never to be seen or heard of again.
2007-09-02 16:18:16 · answer #3 · answered by happyface 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Although I voted for Bill Clinton twice, I've come to strongly distrust the "Clinton machine", its bullying tactics and its secretiveness.
I'd vote for a woman if that woman were Margaret Thatcher or Jeanne Kirkpatrick, but I truly do not think that Hillary Clinton is up to the job, either intellectually or morally.
2007-09-02 16:32:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't. She was a disaster when she ran the government under her husbands name, but she'll be worse when/if she runs America under her own name. Remember she believes in Socialism, government control of the people, National ID cards, the better to keep tabs on the actions of an American citizen, and Universal Health-Care, that has already proven doesn't work, by England, and other countries who have it, and she's a sneaky, lying SOB, oops, DOB. She's already proven all by herself the actions I've accused her of, since America has ever heard of her name.
"It Takes a Village" (her book) to raise a child? NO, it doesn't! It takes a loving parent!
Her book alone proves she is a Socialist.
America stands for FREEDOM of the people. Socialism stands for YOU PEOPLE DON"T GET SQUAT, UNTIL I SAY YOU CAN HAVE IT! I SAY NO, YOU CAN'T: signed President Hellary.
2007-09-02 16:29:19 · answer #5 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not a huge Hillary fan but even she would be a 200% improvement over the past 6+ years with little Bush.
2007-09-02 16:52:32 · answer #6 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeap..She was a former First Lady and a damm good senator. Bill as First Dude that will be a nice change for once.
2007-09-02 18:21:45 · answer #7 · answered by sparkles 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, and I agree, she would be a disaster, and the focus of a witch hunt from the right like this country has never seen.
2007-09-02 16:19:34 · answer #8 · answered by Frank 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
She represents too many lobbyist, never addresses anything about SPP, and I don't like her foreign policies at all unfortunately.
I would have liked a woman to finally take charge, just she is not the right one yet.
2007-09-02 16:13:20 · answer #9 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I know she'd be a disaster. Her and her hubby feed on each others political power to get their dirty agenda's accomplished! I think it's a disgrace and am not understanding how people don't see thru it.
2007-09-02 16:25:20 · answer #10 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋