Justmebackagain- what's happened to you? You seem to have turned extremely aggressive - not like your old self!
Anyway just want to say that I WISH PEOPLE WOULD STOP GENERALISING! I am totally pissed off with people tarring ALL antis AND pros with the same brush. I'm anti McC - to the extent that I've criticised their neglect of those children. As far as I am aware - THIS IS FACT! I've also stated that the whatever happens/happened to Madeleine is a direct result of this neglect. I have NEVER said or even speculated that either of the parents MURDERED their child. I'll leave that one for the police to discover. The majority of the pro-McC's can usually always have either a decent debate or give valid replies. But there are faults on BOTH sides - it's not just one or the other.
2007-09-02 08:13:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tamayah 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Who are you to say what a valid question or a valid answer is?
You are trying to demonise both the parents of a missing girl, and people who decide not to take the same route of posting malicious and callous posts just as you do!
I think your biased post makes you look all the more small minded-do you really think you are the only one that has been sent a violation notice on here? Um, no!
Pretty much everyone that gets involved in this topic has received one, I have and I consider myself neither pro nor anti.
Rather than fighting against people with different opinions to you, why not act like an adult and appreciate not everyone wants to be part of an aggressive witch hunt based upon tabloid media stories, rumours and speculation.
I have read quite a few of your posts and unfortunately they stand out to me because they are always biased and made to create unnecessary taunts and comments made at the expense of either other users or the mccanns.
Don't kid yourself in thinking your 'debating' helps bring Madeleine some justice, it really doesn't, it simply adds fuel to the fire on here and makes the rifts between people on here grow stronger.
2007-09-02 09:03:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by peroxide.pixie 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
I would dearly love to know why the Pro and Anti McCann's ( your label not mine) think that each other is deleting their replies or having their posts deleted. Why would they?
If people are acting in a civil manner and not using abusive, vile or nasty comments on the post that they are replying to. Why would anyone delete them. Constructive criticism is not abhorred by anyone, from what I hear. So why would any one delete replies or have posts deleted for no reason.
What exactly would you consider a valid question that has been deleted?
Why are so many people having to get new ID's. If they have done or said nothing wrong?
Why would Yahoo Answers delete a perfectly valid question or answer?
Are you saying that Yahoo Answers are in league with the Pro-McCann's?
Do you realise how silly you sound?
Well said nanasmaauntie. I hate to tell you this but there are people like him on both side(as you put it) and they are the true trouble makers.
Bang on target there....peroxide.pixie.......
2007-09-02 10:06:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
There is no real news about Madeleine and hasn't been for a long time. All it is now is an arena for people to hurl insults at one another. I imagine that most people are bored to tears with it all.
The sooner the subject is dropped until there is any real news the better for y/a.
2007-09-02 10:31:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beau Brummell 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Um...i don't recall the McCanns reporting anyone...
What you on about today Justme?!
You know fully well the reporting & violations & abuse is from both sides...Don't generalise please.
Have been offline for 2 days & am justbackagain (!) to see a a battle of sorts between you & Jim G...
Let it go please & stick to case in question...
: )
2007-09-02 18:38:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Faith 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
just because somebody smokes a joint when their children are in bed it dosent make them a bad parent
its just the same as having a drink or two , same feeling relaxed and a bit happier
the pro mc canns have tried to stop this debate from the start ,
2007-09-02 10:52:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by stacey 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
The antis are getting more and more aggressive, to the point that at least two have accused Gerry of murder.
Do they not realise that free speech does not include the freedom to commit defamation of character, which they have clearly done.
Slander or the written form, libel, includes anything on the Internet. It would be very easy for the police to locate these accusers via their computers.
I know for a fact that this can be done.
These two, or more, would be wise to retract there accusation as soon as possible, or they may well end up in court where they will need to produce evidence.
This site should not be used to accuse anyone of murder!!!
2007-09-02 07:35:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ed 3
·
7⤊
6⤋
Well I only answer a question if I can give a sensible answer to it. If I don't have an answer then I don't bother.
2007-09-02 08:33:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes I am afraid they are. You have had only 4 months to debate this, hardly enough time. Yes OK sometimes it seems you are just exploring news of charging them with neglect. OK you claim the money in the fund belongs to them when it doesn't. The "facts" often turn out to be what another anti thought they read, who could criticise you for that.
I
2007-09-02 07:46:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
If I can't answer it, I don't.
If the answer is offensive (oh yes, that's what you mean by "valid") I personally ignore it.
If it goes against the guidelines and someone reports you, then it will be removed.
If you don't want it removed, follow the guidelines.
I don't know what you mean by "McCann style".
2007-09-02 07:29:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
4⤊
4⤋