2007-09-02 06:40:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wouldn't be surprised. Look at why he is so passionate about the SPP and keeping it low key. They call it selling out for a reason.
2007-09-02 06:46:13 · answer #1 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Sure. Although now it's over 600 million dollars. If a squirrel is willing to lay down some cash for some tickets, then the squirrel should have an equal shot at the jackpot. Fair is fair.
2016-05-19 04:43:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
his money is in a blind trust.
Of course he is wealthy and in the end will be extremely wealthy.
The Clintons have made over 10 million in book royalties alone and he gets upwards of 100 grand for a speech. The Clintons are worth in the range of 50 million and that didn't come from her wonderful work in the legal profession.
And all politicians books suck.
2007-09-02 06:44:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
But according to so many liberals and democrats, the Fox news network is so full of crap, they're not to be trusted! Suddenly now we are supposed to believe them? Seems pretty selective to me. Kind of like Janet Reno's firing federal judges when she took charge.. What's good for the goose...
2007-09-02 06:50:07 · answer #4 · answered by Doc 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is his salary $400, 000.00 a year add it up. But, I wonder what the cut for that missing money put in Bush and Cheney's pocket. They will never be reported and never found., just a bunch of thugs both of them.
2007-09-02 06:48:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't know if it is true or not, and it does not matter to me. The other sins of Bush would place this one far down on the list of his deceptions, lies, failures and Hypocrisy. This president is an Abomination to every creature upon the earth, and even the good name of the sons of men, who we send to bleed for his war, which he started out of personal vanity, and no other reason.
2007-09-02 06:46:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Listen, if you're going to make a clain as spectacular as this, you need to supply SCHOLARLY proof. Not only in all things in life but ESPECIALLY on this site!
Sadly, no, you and wikipedia are NOT scholarly.
May I see a link before I answer you?
2007-09-02 06:51:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Doing what? Your lack of information or link is telling.
How much did Dianne Feinstein get?
2007-09-02 06:43:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not True. His tax returns are a matter of public record.
2007-09-02 06:44:16 · answer #9 · answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes and you should see what Cheney got!!!
2007-09-02 06:43:14 · answer #10 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋