2007-09-02 06:37:39 · 32 answers · asked by lauren s 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Im too young to vote but I would choose obama!
2007-09-02 06:42:11 · answer #1 · answered by Jess 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Of those three I think I like Edwards the best. He is the best speaker, he says the most intelligent things.
But I would vote for any Democrat over the Republicans. All the Republicans sound very much alike, except Ron Paul. I appreciate Paul's honesty and forthrightness, but I don't actually agree with him on many things. I don't think he has a prayer of getting the nomination anyway. Whoever the Republicans put up will be just as much of a partisan stooge as Bush is--that's how the party works.
I'm not a Democrat either, I think they are also corrupt but MUCH the lesser of two evils. If Hillary got elected and did as good a job as her husband, she would be one of the two best presidents we've had since Kennedy.
2007-09-02 06:53:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not Clinton. The 1st Clinton screwed up enough, and being a women myself, I know that a women is far to emotional to be president and have that responsibility, and would more likely have a breakdown.
I would vote Edward, because he supports gay marriages.
Let men marry men if they want. Wiccans are allowed to practice their religion, why shouldn't Gays be allowed to marry. People should be able to do what makes them happy as long as they do not physically harm another. If there is supposed to be a separation of church and state, then why is gay marriage banned?? The only reason being gay is considered morally wrong, is because it is said to be in the bible. So I think if they are going to do things like not let you bring a bible to school, they should let gays marry. They are picking and choosing, they need to either separate the church from the government, or they need to connect them. It isn't fair.
2007-09-02 06:58:18 · answer #3 · answered by jimis_g_i_r_l 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Fred Thompson!
I will NEVER vote for Hillary, Obama, Edwards, McCain or Paul!
2007-09-03 12:01:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton
2007-09-02 07:23:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
John Edwards
2007-09-02 06:41:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I would like to vote for Obama but when he said Pakistan. I decided that Edwards would be a better choice. We need real leadership. Not one that can be bought.
2007-09-02 06:57:57 · answer #7 · answered by zanada1 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In a minute. So, the place we are you while those assaults occurred below Bush? On June 14, 2002, the terrorist team Al Qanoon, which replaced into suspected to be an al Qaeda branch, despatched a suicide bomber into the U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, killing 12 people and injuring fifty one others. almost a three hundred and sixty 5 days later, 4 have been convicted of plotting the bombing, which blew in homestead windows and left physique aspects everywhere in the sidewalks close to the embassy. On February 28, 2003, Gunmen on motorcycles attacked the U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, killing 2 cops and wounding 5 different officers and a civilian in front of the consulate. previous due in the night of could 12, 2003, gunmen entered Al Hamra Oasis Village in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, a compound usual to be inhabited by people and different Westerners. On July 30, 2004, 3 suicide bombers focused on the Israeli and U.S. embassies in Taskkent, Uzbekistan controlled to kill 2 and injure 9 others. On December 6, 2004, terrorists stormed the heavily guarded U.S. consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, occupying it and taking 18 hostages for a time. while the incident replaced into over, that they had killed 9 people, alongside with 4 protection guards and 5 artwork rigidity. On March 2, 2006, purely 2 days beforehand President Bush replaced into scheduled to flow to Pakistan, a suicide bomber centred the U.S. consulate in Karachi, killing 4, alongside with a US diplomat believed to be the objective, and as many as 50 others. On September 12, 2006, 4 armed gunmen stormed the U.S. embassy in Damascus, Syria. in the 20 minute attack, they threw grenades and fired computerized weapons at guards. in the top, one individual replaced into killed and 13 wounded. On January 12, 2007, a rocket-propelled grenade replaced into fired on the US Embassy in Athens Greece. luckily, it replaced into early morning, and the construction replaced into empty and no one replaced into injured. On July 9, 2008, adult adult males armed with a shotgun and pistols stormed the U.S. consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. on the top of the 5-minute conflict, 3 Turkish policemen have been killed. So, the place replaced into your outrage then?
2016-10-17 12:05:11 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could you imagine Hillary or Obama in heated negotiations with hostile foreign leaders? They are believers in multiculturalism and would give opponents anything, so that we could be more like them. We need strong leadership. Vote for Fred Thompson. Or at least GOP.
2007-09-02 06:55:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Fred Thompson
2007-09-02 07:38:46 · answer #10 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well, Homer Simpson couldn't possibly do any worse than the clown we have in office now. But I would vote for John Edwards.
2007-09-02 06:45:36 · answer #11 · answered by govsgirl72 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋