English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"He will be judged as a man of moral clarity who put America on wartime footing in the dangerous struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. Following the horrors of 9/11, this president changed American foreign policy by declaring terror sponsors responsible for the deeds of those they shelter, train, and fund. America, he said, will not wait until dangers fully materialize with attacks on our homeland before confronting those threats. The president gave the nation new tools to defeat terrorism abroad and protect our citizens at home with the Patriot Act, foreign surveillance that works in the wireless age, a transformed intelligence community, and the Department of Homeland Security. And this president saw the wisdom of removing terrorism’s cause by advocating the spread of democracy, especially in the Muslim world, where authoritarianism and repression have provided a potent growth medium for despair and anger aimed at the West. He recognized that democracy there makes us safer here."

2007-09-02 05:50:34 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

24 answers

He was the worst possible man at the worst moment in our history.He has used 9/11 to begin a war that is the first step of a struggle to gain control of the last oil reserves,to scale back civil liberties,to violate the constitution,to enrich his already rich corporate masters,and to enslave the American worker as a low paid drone in the corporate take-over of the world economy..

So,no.You,Rush,Billo,and all the other fools who follow this monster can take him and...well,you know....

2007-09-02 05:59:32 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 9 2

Next you will be telling me Bush is a Politician.
He couldn't see further than the end of his nose.
It was an ill conceived War made all the more worst by Blair joining him. They decided to invade well before 2003 the WMD lie was just an excuse.
They went in against the UN resolution at the time.
He has let his Forces down, they done their job but were let down by the Politicians lack of an after plan.
Bush/Blair/Rums felt believed it would be over in months
I still believe it was all about Oil.
They Soldiers are asked to be Policemen,if they over step the mark they face Court Marshalls.They must think they sometimes face the enemy on two fronts.
No matter when they get out the Country will descent into Civil War.
If Bush wants to save lives He will have to get some dialogue with Iran /Syria no matter how distasteful.
The Russians got a bloody nose in Afganistan ,PG its not our turn now.

2007-09-03 06:40:14 · answer #2 · answered by cowboy 2 · 0 0

Well! That's certainly a mouthful---of distortions. King George the Moron confronted the threat by attacking a country that had nothing to do with 9/11. Nor did it have weapons of mass destruction. Using words of mass deception, the Moron caused the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. Meanwhile, OBL is laughing his bu** off at us---we've squandered any world sympathy we got after 9/11; we've spent hundreds of billions to no good end, thus endangering our economy; and we've divided our nation (as this Q&A amply demonstrates).
As far as the Patriot Act is concerned, one of the Founding Fathers said that "those who would temporarily give up liberty for security deserve neither." That fits perfectly, lo these many years later. And the Moron should be impeached for illegal wiretaps: he broke the law. Period.
I guess "new tools to defeat terrorism abroad" include secret prisons, torture, Gitmo, imprisonment of American citizens without trial or constitutional legal rights of any kind, and whatever else has been done that isn't known yet. And this is the party of American VALUES?????
So I guess this is the "American democracy" we are spreading abroad. And what gives us the right to spread it (whatever it is) at gunpoint? Since we're the 800-pound gorilla? How about "moral suasion" (convincing people, not with bullets but with words and deeds like the Peace Corps). Nope, not violent enough.
I am comforted by having finally figured out why 30% of Americans still support the Moron. They're in a coma.

2007-09-02 11:16:24 · answer #3 · answered by pasdeclef 3 · 1 1

Hello, Total agreement with you here's the but, he should have ask his advisers if the Middle East is ready or wants democracy and maybe had a quiet word in Saddam's ear as the West armed and backed him against Iran who are now instigating terrorism in Iraq if not though-out the world.What country or state can say they have democracy if the leaders depend on secret police (murderers) to put terror into it's people.Was the war on Iraq the outcome of the Scud missiles fired on Israel just a political move.?Untill all true Democracy countrys truly unite and take the head off the snake can the war on terrorism begin.

2007-09-06 02:42:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would only partially agree with some of this. Too much porn for a man can ruin the intimacy he has with a wife/gf and can affect his performance. But how much is "excessive?" Where is the line drawn? Is it zero? Would someone say that 10 min a week is too much? 100 min? 10 hours? Internet porn has been quite available for a good 15-20 years. How many people under the age of 30 would even be able to remember what men were like "before porn." There are many younger people posting here. As for "daily pleasure," studies have actually shown that more frequent ejaculations actually reduce the man's risk for prostate cancer.

2016-05-19 03:52:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

thats a great statement. it is well written and thought out. what you dont seem to realise is that very nearly mirrors a speach made in 1938 just before the start of WW II by ADOLF HITLER and again by Himler. G W BUSH was and is a charleton ,a liar and a tyrant. you must not get the same news we do. he seems to enforce human rights violations on others while he orders them broken by his own people. kidnappings of foriegn citizens even after the courts of that land say he may not have a particular person on thier sovriegn territory. torcher planes were they brutilise people just for know some one who is a suspect. . homeland security is a joke so is the patrioit act. if you belive what you wrote my friend you are somewhat taken in by the lie.

i lived in the usa for 36 years i serverd in the army for 25 years and retired a comand sergeant major. i loved the us army and the soldiers, i was proud to serve and serve those i fought with. it is no longer so for those thier now. they are in an illeagle war run by a leader who makes up the rules as he goes and is makeing an enemy of every nation on the planet , G W BUSH is even doing it to you ally england, were i come from..

wake up and smell the coffee you cant stand alone. if G W BUSH keeps takeing you down the path you are on it will distry the USA

2007-09-02 08:27:05 · answer #6 · answered by IHATETHEEUSKI 5 · 1 0

I would swear from that reasoning that the author has been smoking an illegal substance.

I think this is a bunch of baloney. History will see that he invaded Iraq because his Dad was shamed by not going in and finishing the job the first time.

He had Saddam's pistol brought to his office as a trophy... American lives bought that prize to show his Dad. What a horrid cost for personal satisfaction.



g-day!

2007-09-02 07:25:33 · answer #7 · answered by Kekionga 7 · 2 0

What a pathetic jinkoistic and highly ignorant pile of slop this asker insults us with.

This post is an INSULT to all thinking,educated,knowledgable moral people and I make absolutely NO apologies for the tone on my reply which is exactly what this asker deserves.



Bush has MORAL CLARITY?? Are you both ignorant and mad? Listen up old morally bankrupted one,the ONLY MORAL CLARITY SHOWN IN BUSH"S illegal war of choice that has seen the slaughter of over 400,000 INNOCENT Iraqi civilians has been shown by ALL the mainstream Christian Churches including Bush's own Methodist Church that have CONDEMNED THIS WAR AS A MORAL OBSCENITY AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN !!!!

http://home.uchicago.edu/~vofunk/FaithBasedWar.doc

http://www.acmica.org/pub_brennan.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/20/opinion/20marsh.html?ei=5088&emc=rss&en=9609bfe3755d0c4d&ex=1295413200&partner=rssnyt

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0724-22.htm

Most experts agree that 9/11 (specifically Bin Laden and Al qaeda) is the result of the atrocities that the US has committed in the Middle East since WW1 from overthrowing the DEMOCRATICALLY elected Iranian government in 1953 to the US's constant full support of murderous right wing dictators in the region like Saddam,Saudi Arabia,Egypt etc etc etc.]

The Muslim/Arabs peoples of this region are the ones being horribly killed,oppressed and violated because the US militarily ,economically and politically supports these vile HATERS OF DEMOCRACY FREEDOM AND LIBERTY.

How the hell can the Muslim/Arabs in the region have nothing but hate towards the US and Americans for what the US has done3 ubto thenm for akmost a century.(all for oil of course)

Here are but a few of the horrid atrocities that the US has committed world wide and as you good litlle Christian Americans read this list ,just ask yourselves one question and that is "What would an American do if any country dared do unto the US what the US has done unto these countries and peoples " ?

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/CIAtimeline.html


You would simply carpet bomb them .Do they not have the same "moral" right??

Another example of both YOUR and Americans monumental hypocritical moral position is that you see nothing wrong with violating the sovereienty of other countries and causing the slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians just so YOU can feel safe.

The rest of the world including Spain and Britain are no longer going to tolerate the US using their soil to have their citizens killed .

A perfect example of American moral bankrupcy is that they are all happy that no terrorists has attacked on US soil since 9/11 but these vile morally banrupt souls don't give a damn that many others in SPAIN,BRITAIN,BALI etc etc etc have been slaughtered since 9/11 because BUSH turned a TERRORIST FREE Iraq into a TERRORIST HAVEN/MAGNET and so enraged the Muslim world that Al Qaeda's membership has soared.

I and most around the world are simply fed up with this BS about Bush spreadinf democracy around the world.

The historical FACTS are that the US has DESTROYED at least 14 democracies around the world since 1953 and replaced these free and liberated democracies with ruthless,murderous right wing killing dictators from the Shah of Iran in Iran to A,Pinochet in Chile charged with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

As the VERIFIABLE HISTORICAL RECORD ATTESTS TO ,the US has never been ,is not and never will be a beacon for democracy,freedom and liberty and in fact in many cases the DIRECT OPPOSITE.

What the US is and always has been is a beacon for American styled capitalism period and wherever and whenever the US NATIONAL INTERESTS (READ PROFITS) are threatened,the US will destroy whatever government is threatening their profits. (Exactly like they did in Iran in 1953 and Chile in 1973 and at least 12 other countries.)

For this asker to spew the crap about America striving to replace "authoritarianism and repression" when the US has an OBSCENE past and present policy of fully supporting militarily and economically ruthless filthy freedom ,liberty,and democracy hating right wing despots ,is the height of hypocricy and simply a filthy propaganda lie .

Now go educate yourself and beg forgiveness for the lies you have written here which are no different then the LIES of Bush that has resulted in the slaughter of hundreds of thousands and ALL HAVE DIED FOR NOTHING (but oil and profits)

Lastly the fact that YOU have the un-mitigated gall of accusing others of "BIASED" reporting when your entire spewing is nothing but VERIFIABLE LIES is simply astounding.

2007-09-02 07:19:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Considering his Daddy hired the man W decided he needed to remove before invading Iran for the oil, any comments on Islamic terrorists are just cowboy drivel. Islamic terrorists have as their target the restoration of the Palestinians to the homeland. Christians only become the target when they become too active in the support of the Jewish occupation.

2007-09-02 05:59:54 · answer #9 · answered by St N 7 · 4 3

HAHAHAHA....another one who swallowed the Kool Aid.

Der Fuhrer cannot make an error!

Der Fuhrer has secret weapons to save us!

Der Fuhrer is merely letting the Allies land in Normany to bring them in!

*****************************

God save us from these fools who post this nonsense.The world already knows George Bush is the worst American president in history.

What is particularly amusing about the question is that the 9-11 terrorists were Saudis, and gee, Bush is still their friend.

How 'bout that! Care to explain?

2007-09-02 06:07:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers