Neither, but thank you for playing.
2007-09-02 04:39:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the real world I must say that men have been a failure from the begining of time starting with listening to the woman in the garden.But as evolution progresses men have not been able to get it done. Middle Eastern traaditions favor Ohbama. In the world that we know today,. Hillary clintons election well not set well with the sodi government, but as I was surrounded by the french woman soldeirs they are willing to fight for what they believe in.In the world of the things that arw hoped for all things are possible and all things work together to make the world a better place. Truly I say we need a new council I would set them all in place. to judge together. I would open up my vote to the public to make sure I am counting correctly no secret vote. like in the US Than I would make sure everyones vote was right.I do not trust them at this time.
2007-09-02 04:54:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by STB 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
r u kidding just because they could be first. and I know what a "beautiful thing that is in this day in age" you can read the sarcasm there. Doesn't mean it is good. These two candidates scare the crap out of me like no one else running. I have nothing against voting for a black man or a woman. However I don't think you should vote for anyone just because they are such. The thought of public medicine is horrifying if you think that Canadians have it so good talk to some that have used it. Can you imagine our hospitals being run like the DMV or even worse like the Social Security System.Sheesh!!!
2007-09-02 04:46:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anson W 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Judging from Hillary's past performance as a Senator, the double talk and back-pedaling she has done, both as the Jr. Senator from NY and while the First Lady, I don't trust anything she says. Universal Health Care will bankrupt this nation faster than the medicare and Medicaid systems already are.
Obama, OTOH, is a FIRST term representative. He has neither the experience or wisdom to lead the most powerful nation in the world.
Please, I urge all of you to go to www.OnThe Issues.org and just see the inconsistencies coming from both these candidates.
2007-09-02 04:50:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
None of the above Obama is not qualified enough and Clinton just say what the people she's talking to wants to here. Plus I don't vote for socialist's
2007-09-02 04:44:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by mak86nra 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
what about the other 6 candidates like Biden and Kucinich. Obama and Hillary are the two most popular but in my opinion the two worst candidates on most issues. Esepcially regarding WTO and NAFTA.
2007-09-02 04:40:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Edge Caliber 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither both want amnesty for illegals, both will take us to war with Pakistan and Iran, both will tax the middle class and poor highly... It doesn't make a difference to me that one is a woman or one is black.. It's where they stand on the issues.. Like most politicians they plan to do nothing...
2007-09-02 04:56:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. People should be elected president based on their record of accomplishment, leadership, and executive experience. These two have none of the above. Race and gender are entirely irrelevant.
2007-09-02 04:43:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dan 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Clinton.
2007-09-02 04:40:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If that is my two choices, then Clinton by a mile. However, I would like to see a viable independent candidate.
2007-09-02 04:39:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Edwards
.
2007-09-02 04:41:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋