English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

To the American voter come 08 elections? The neocon TROLL BOSS sure doesn't like it when valid questions are being asked in the Politics section of Yahoo. I am sure the Neocon TROLL BOSS will want to censor this question because they have no answers except to try to blame their own actions on a Democrat without any facts to their claims. The American voter isn't being fooled by this though. Neocon spin means next to nothing just like their answers here. Who else wants change and to be free of these tyrants?

2007-09-02 03:38:54 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Funny how the TROLL BOSS attacked this question and tried to spin it, while it is being used as an example of the TROLL PATROLS actions here on the Yahoo politics page. I blocked them on the other questions but they have hundreds of fake multiple accounts to spam the questions with. Will Yahoo ever take control of this TROLL that is trying to sway opinions and is point gaming this page?

2007-09-02 04:12:20 · update #1

20 answers

No. There's so much Republican corruption yet to be uncovered, that voters will have forgotten this old, and relatively minor stuff.

2007-09-02 03:43:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

The media will make Craig and Foley's actions outside of congress examples of Bush's leadership. This is rediculous! The Republican party removes party members when they do something illegal or immoral. The Democrat party rallies behind them and supports them. Barney Frank was caught and admitted that his live in boyfriend is a prostitute and was running a prostitution ring in Barney's home and the Democrat's rallied behind Barney and he's till in office. Can you say Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton. Clinton's impeachment was because he lied under oath in a Sexual Harrasment law suit. He was forcing himself on people that worked for him and was found guilty committing purgery when testifying about this. The Democrats came to the aid of someone that purgered themselves in a sexual harrassment lawsuit. How sick is that? The media spun the story to a consentual sex story. They used to always say there is no such thing as consentual sex when there is a power difference between a boss and someone under them. If this is true immaging the difference between the President and an intern. Amazing hypocrasy.

Once again the big difference is the Republicans stand up for what is right and if there is a problem they remove the person that has caused the problem. The Democrats use illegal activity as a resume booster. Democrat Leahy of Vermont was found guilty of giving up confidential top secrets and he still serves on the Intelligence committee. Democrat Jefferson Clinton of Louisiana was just reelected even though he was found with $80,000 of FBI bribe money. Ted Kennedy has been in countless sexual harrassment, rape, leaving the scene of a crime type situations and Democrats support him. The younger Kennedy was high on drugs, crashed his car and Democrats support him. I could go on and on though the obvious end result is Democrats support and reelect illegal and immoral activity and Republicans do not. Just look at the actions of both parties.

2007-09-02 10:58:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

And how does gay democrats
Danial Inooye
Brock Aams
Gus Savage of Ill.
John Young
Gerry Studds
Barney Franks
Wayne Hayes
Mel Reynolds who was pardoned by Clinton with 17 gay molestations which inclued boys and then reinstated
And heres the kicker! Craig Johnson and Matt Titone were elected in New York state assembly by GLID the Gay and Liberal Indipendent Democrats association!!! The democrats actually have an organization that helps get their gay democrats in office!!!!

2007-09-02 11:25:28 · answer #3 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0 1

I don't really care about Craig. Foley is a pedophile and the real problems with that is the GOP leadership covered it up.

My bigger concern are people like Duke Cunningham and Bob Ney (both in prison for taking bribes) and Ted Stevens from Alaska (who will probably be in prison soon).

It's not just Washington. John Rowland was GOP governor of Connecticut and he resigned in disgrace and spent time in prison for taking bribes (official they were gifts). The former Illinois Governor of Illinois, Ryan, has been convicted of racketeering.

These guy are using the positions of power given to them by the people for the benefit of the people, for their own benefit at the EXPENSE of the people.

These are the guys that have to be rooted out.

2007-09-02 10:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by arvis3 4 · 0 1

Why should you blame Bush for what someone else does?
I dont think that is the way of life in the USA. It seems as tho
everyone wants to blame everything on Bush. I will admit that
I think he is wrong for putting his nose into other countrys
businesses.Other countrys should take care of their own
problems and not try to judge them be our standards. Stop
and think Just how free is our country? We have to pay for
everything we get in the USA. The government tells us what
we can and cant do. That doesnt sound like freedom.

2007-09-02 10:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by Jimmy H 2 · 1 0

Sounds like a rant instead of a question to me, but Larry Craig and Mark Foley has nothing to do with the leadership of Bush, as they were voted in by citizens of Florida and Idaho,who then screwed up, made the people who voted for them very upset, then resigned...Now if they were Democrats, they would still be in office and all of their supporters would continue to support them because they are, well, freaks, who are into that sort of thing...Nice rant all the same!

2007-09-02 10:47:36 · answer #6 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 1 1

I'm no fan of the Republicans, I assure you. But creeps of this type pop up in both parties, remember. And notice that the democrats have not said a word about Larry Craig. It was the republicans who pressured him out. They did the right thing. At least in this case.

They've done plenty to disgrace themselves. We don't need to pile on false charges.

2007-09-02 10:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by Robert K 5 · 0 0

If I recall, Craig was a member of congress, that same wonderful group of people that has a 28% approval??????????nd also has members naked Obama, Clinton, Edwards, kennedy?
Amnd wa Craig appointed by Bush.
N ooooooooooooooooo!

It sounds like you Bush haters are running out of original material,

2007-09-02 10:48:54 · answer #8 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0 0

Craig, Foley, and Bush are not running in 08.

2007-09-02 10:56:54 · answer #9 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0 0

No!! How can any one be held responsible for anothers actions?? That is the same as a person saying you are responsible for their actions. We are only responsible for what we do. Lord knows I have my own problems with out being held accountable for my neighbors as well.

2007-09-02 10:53:02 · answer #10 · answered by poppawick 4 · 0 0

Sure. The same way your actions are reflective of your parents. They are, after all, completely and totally responsible for everything you say or do for every minute you are on earth!

2007-09-02 10:46:57 · answer #11 · answered by Lorre W 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers