Hmmm, that leaves over $127K unaccounted for. Where do you suppose all that filthy lucre went? The Scrooge McDuck Money Vault in Chappequa, NY? By the way, just exactly what charity was the receipient of this paultry $23K? Was it the Clinton Family Charity?
2007-09-02 03:09:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Funny, I did check out their charity, and even a lib can see that it was designed to provide the Clintons with more tax breaks, kinda like the rent that they charge the Secret Sevice at their Chappequa home, that exactly equals their mortgage payment.
2007-09-02 03:16:17 · update #1
Suthrnlyts, that's exactly the one I'm talking about. Anyone want to bet against that's where it went
2007-09-02 03:25:27 · update #2
Surely, you're not surprised? I'm certainly not and yeah, which charity did that paultry sum end up going towards? I'm betting it went to this one:
2007-09-02 03:21:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
There are two sets of rules. One for LibDems that state hypocrisy is the order of the day. The other rule says Republicans are to be vigorously damned for doing the same thing.
People may not know why the alleged "crime" the Craig did not commit has been splashed all over the Lib controlled mainstream media, but it seems fairly obvious that it sure does direct a lot of attention away from the ill gotten campaign contribution that Hillary and her pals took.
So much for Nancy Pelosi's big promise of the LibDems bringing "ethics" back into government.
2007-09-02 05:15:24 · answer #2 · answered by dave b 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely amazing. Yet you won't see a LICK of this on the front page of the New York Times, the LA Times, on CNN, MSNBC, or on any of the other mainstream media outlets. I guess a republican senator from Idaho being ACCUSED of inappropriate behavior in a public restroom sells more newspapers than a democratic presidential candidate accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal campaign contributions!
FACT: 73 House and Senate witnesses have pled
the 5th Amendment and 17 witnesses have fled the country to avoid testifying about Democratic campaign fund raising as it relates to the CLINTONS over the last several years!!!!!
2007-09-02 03:47:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That does not surprise me, the Clinton's are as dirty as they come. But as a side note, that is false in regards to charging the secret service rent.
2007-09-02 03:30:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The rest went into the Chelsea Clinton plastic surgery fund.
Fund raisers say that despite the generous gift it will still take a lot more money to make a difference.
2007-09-02 03:14:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Kinda like Romney's National Finance Committee Co-Chairman who was just indicted on money laundering,mail fraud,bankruptcy fraud,obstruction of justica and perjury?
No,it's not.Why?Because he stole $36 MILLION,that's why.
So shut your yap,because we can talk about all the Giuliani people indicted for fraud and other crimes,or all the McCain people who have been busted....
As usual the GOP holds up one person to compare to the entire Republican establishment....
2007-09-02 04:16:38 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You didn't really expect her to give it to a well know legal charity like the American Heart Assoc. did you?
It'll end up back in her campaign fund thru a series of "cut outs" and "backdoors".
2007-09-02 03:34:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is just another "cattle futures" thing that the media will sweep away and stupid dems are too busy hating bush to notice. Lenin sure was right about useful idiots.
2007-09-02 03:15:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I can't believe anyone would be surprised. Nothing she does surprises me.
It probably went to this charity - "Clintonisbetterthantherest.com".... or something similar.
2007-09-02 08:34:45 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Easy, it is called BushMath.
And the ungrounded innuendo that the charity was their own pockets - why, how SwiftBoatie Rovian of you!!! Has it occurred to you to actually check it out before throwing out something you just made up?
EDIT - Okay you checked out the charity, so tell us what it was?? AND if you google Clinton Secret Service Payment it will tell you that the Clintons have been permitted by statute to charge $1100 per month for Secret Service presence but have chosen not to do so.
Like I said, you'll have more credibility if you once try to actually present a few facts in your rant.
2007-09-02 03:14:35 · answer #10 · answered by ash 7 · 3⤊ 8⤋
The money was "recycled", via her nigerian letter to the faithful. She turned the money over to "shadow donors", who routed it through their bank accounts and re-donated it in their own names. All it required was them giving her their account number and the DNC took care of the rest.
2007-09-02 03:17:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋