Wikipedia is not all biased and is quite often very accurate but because it does not support their evil agenda they condemn it!
2007-09-02 02:33:38 · 6 answers · asked by 2012 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Of course they would just like they make hero's out of right wing hate machines like An Coulter who openly promotes American fascism("let's go over there kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity") and Rush.
They have their own reality where anyone who doesn't agree with their far right rhetoric is a traitor and an enemy.In that regard they truly resemble the climate Nazi's created in Germany in the thirties.
Take a Hitler speech, replace the world Jew with liberal and you're ready to go on right wing talk radio
2007-09-02 03:08:31 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm...looks like you got to the crack pipe kinda early today.
'Evil agenda'. Do you think that anyone engaged in furthering an evil agenda really cares what's written in Wikipedia? Evil agendas take a lot of work to implement and we don't have time to mindlessly surf the web.
RAM
Founding Member,
Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
2007-09-02 02:41:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Anyone with absolutely no knowledge or sources to back up their information can edit Wikipedia. Great for freedom of thought. Bad for legitimate information.
Anyone who has been to college should be able to tell you that you need reliable sources.
I hope this helps you.
2007-09-02 02:46:35 · answer #3 · answered by Chief Yellow Horse 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When have conservatives ever bashed Wiki? and plus it's liberals who have an evil surrendering, treasonous, baby-murdering, tax-raising agenda.
2007-09-02 02:39:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I think they try to maintain a "standard", and I use wiki on my 360 when referencing ideas.
It is neutral.
This morning I discussed Israel, probably the most contreversial thing.
Wiki is good stuff.
2007-09-02 02:38:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
If it was un editable
2007-09-02 02:43:22 · answer #6 · answered by ken s 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋