What evidence was there for the plum pudding model of the atom?

Answer 1

It was formulated before any evidence was available to point toward any different model. It was mostly an extrapolation of the homogeneity of matter that we observe on a larger scale.

Answer 2

that they had no better kind. the plum pudding kind allowed for atoms to have the two valuable and risks. it become first believed that atoms basically contained electrons and that the mass of the atom = the form of electrons modern-day. the subject with it is that atoms are independent so there had to be something to counteract the damaging can charge of the electrons. considering that atoms are too small to verify by way of the bare eye, the form of electrons had to be equivalent to the respective atomic quantity and, to stability the can charge of the electron, the form of + charged debris in an atom had to = the form of electrons. there become no general nucleus on the time till the gold foil test confirmed that atoms are as a rule empty area with a dense nucleus made out of + debris.

Answer 3

Only the knowledge that the atom contains protons and electrons (and neutrons). The model was a speculative theory which collapsed when they bombarded an atom with alpha particles, the scattering of which showed that most of the atom is empty space.

Answer 4

well they knew that the atom was nutrall and that it had at least 2 diferent things in it (protons and electrons) so they just said "well it must be a ball then".

Answer 5

None - it was just a starting point, a guess. They knew that it was probably going to be disproved sooner or later. You have to start somewhere ....

Answer 6

To which particular atom are you referring?

Answer 7

indigestion