would basic, rustic and eco-tourism mean inadequate facilities?

Answer 1

not necessary. when we say ecotourism the primary travel destination is where flora, fauna and cultural heritage is the primary attraction but at the same time it takes into consideration enery efficiency, water conservation, recycling, and the creation of economic opportunities for the local communities. ideally ecotourism should promote the conservation of cultural and biological diversity thru the protection of the ecosystem. it should also promote sustainable use of biodiversity by providing jobs to the local population. likewise, the local communities and the indigenous people in the area should have their informed consent and participation in the management of the ecotourism enterprise. it should also promote the increase of environmental and cultural knowledge. tourism should have a minimal impact to the environment, should be affordable and should lack waste in the form of luxury.

Answer 2

I don't think so, ga. It only means that in an attempt to preserve authenticity, it is best to leave some tourist spots exactly the way they are. There's some romantic notion about being rustic and idyllic...kinda like time stood still for those places. Sometimes the unique charm is lost in renovation or modernization so better to leave it as is. In this case, basic is better.

Answer 3

No.

What this means is spartan, no-frills accommodations in eco destinations. Like Cagayan de Oro which is a top eco-tourism destination, but where provisions are adequate. Or Bontoc where my friends go kayaking or white water rafting but they are able to book decent quarters.

Answer 4

eco-tourism must be a developed place or resort for the conveniency of the tourists with preservation of its natural resources.

Answer 5

It depends on the interpretation.