Does anyone else agree that only possible answer to the equation above is Big Brother?
Big Business needs as powerful a Big Government as it can get to keep itself BIG. Big government needs more and more ways to watch us and control us to keep the taxes coming. Together they are one big happy family.
To meet its clear. Liberals and Conservatives have been played by the parties that supposedly represent them. Can't both sides see that?
Will you join me in joining the Vegan Party?
I love to eat meat.. but when i vote I vote: VEGAN
No pork. Period.. NONE.
No bull. We hear bull we vote for other guy!
No sheep. Thats us. No more of that.
No snakes. Vote out career politicians.
No fish. Something smells in Washington (and most state capitols.. Illinois is VERY stinky)
Its a start anyhow.
2007-09-01 22:05:05 · 5 answers · asked by kent j 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
yes hmmm yes - although I wonder why so many pretend to be
asking a question when indeed intended to give own answers ...
but right - I would have equalled big turd
and yet pointing out you may say rupert to him ...
maybe I smoked too much in my hippie years but I see
empires of evil everywhere - google will be another one
soon also - remind nicely ot the department of information
retrieval as allegedly just fiction in 'Brazil' - like torture etc ...
still not enough to vote for snakes like paul - who wonders
he's an asocial - got about the hugest private gold reserves
in america, good homebase with destroyed monetary system
and a constitution as from forefarters with blacks as 3/5 of a
human and only landowning (white) males allowed to vote ...
all the nasty females will have no choice against rapists then.
libertarian - ROFLMAOZEDONG - ya my butt ! he's liberal
only with his freedom to change viewpoints as the wind blows.
all the aryan brotherhoods support him for no reason I guess.
killary bush-lite neither. as for coke, no artificial sweetness plz
obama oh my - well I don't think it's about it was the TURN for
women or blacks now, it should be about who CARES for you
and obama cared a bit too swiftly for showing the country''s
mighty penis in an arabian sandbox real quick - at least the
bump in his pants - contrary to common sense no problem for
hillary btw - I always thought clinton had conquered the mount
everest, but it was hillary of course - and billy conquered her.
edwards is the typical kennedy-ng type, talented grin, yea.
but actually too lazy and wishiwashi to be a good politician.
the only completely integer dems seem gravel and kucinich.
while I won't even start going for easy scores slaying the reps
giuliani is sure particulary impudent - the great zero tolerance
weiner caught as the first with mishandling campaign funds.
most of the others are not even as actors any acceptable ...
2007-09-01 23:00:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
I take it you're a moderate of some kind.
Big Business would equal Republicans for most people.
Big Government would equal Democrats for most people.
We need a positive business environment in order to stimulate growth and keep the supply of jobs high.
We need a functioning government with enough money to take care of necessary and important protects and services: the Military for one (!!!), schools and education, law enforcement, roads and infrastructure such as energy, public works and public buildings, and a functioning healthcare system.
Keep up the free thought. I'll think of you next time I eat a big American hamburger (here in Holland).
2007-09-02 00:03:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I feel i will try to take a stab at this query. Though I take into account myself to be conservative, i will try to reply this in a deferential and considerate process. a million) In answering this query, one might are prone to ask a different query. This question can also be, "Has the running form had a reduction within the nice of lifestyles earlier forty years? Many can also be willing to claim that's has no longer. In relation to those political matters, you might to discover evidence and knowledge to support each argument. Much of the time, it with no trouble is discovered by means of what you desire to believe. Arguments helping that that the common of dwelling has no longer declined might incorporate the fairly unfastened go with the flow of credit score ranking (even given the recession commencing in 2008) and the tremendous availability of cheap purchaser models. two) The reply to this query can also be similar to the predominant. Most economists, who have a giant figuring out of marketplace forces, might disagree with you. If enterprises and the wealthy alike had been relieved of one of the vital tax burden, then might have extra vigor to each hire additional wages an raises alike. Proof to support this argument probably learned in taking a appear at probably the most significant extra socialist international locations in Europe, Sweden. In examining swedish companies, you might observe that no longer a unmarried fortune 500 corporation has been situated considering the fact that the implementation of heavy socialist coverage insurance policies. Additionally, If Sweden used to be as soon as a US state, then its common of dwelling can also be inside the backside 10. Three) probably the most principal factors that republicans support coverage insurance policies favorable to colossal organizations can also be that, if we make it too rough to behaviour exchange in this country, then they would pass someplace else. Why might you, as a corporation, desire to role in an surroundings that closely punishes wealth and unfastened corporation? I don't condemn exertions unions and minimal salary legislation, nonetheless I additionally don't keep in mind that a "soak the wealthy" coverage is a nice inspiration. It probably better to have companies "hoarding up profits", than to reside in a society had practically no employment or industry possibility. I believe the depressed stipulations of The Soviet Union and eastern Europe will need to be first-class examples for the aid of this idea.
2016-09-05 21:25:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your Conclusion sounds about right. Though logic you used to get there seemed a bit flawed. But I can see you have at least a few ideas worth hearing. Who do you consider the Vegan candidate this year?
Mike Huckabee?
about the closet to honest you can get in a politician.
I just checked on my snowball in Hell, it wasn't doing very well.
2007-09-01 22:18:41 · answer #4 · answered by James L 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes!! thats why I'm voting for Ron Paul.. no corporate sponsers...
2007-09-02 03:15:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋