A military strike on Iran imminent..?

Question

For the sake of peace.Iran must face military actions immediately. I, was pro-dimplomacy,but I think a Iran is calling our bluff. This is not a poker game,and im tired of reading about Coalition casulties,when clearly,Iran is pulling the strings.
What do U think?..

Answer 1

In order to save them we had to kill them. I don't think so. Sure we could do bombing, but what good is that, when you have to follow up with with ground troops? The Army has said they are stretched to the limit now, and the Army is doing it mostly in Iraq, fighting and dying. The use of force has limits. The America People have limits and escalating the war into Iran will push the people way past their limits.

Answer 2

Iran is a country on it´s own with it´s own borders. They have a right to do whatever they like within their own borders. They have threatened no one. The USA on the otherhand sees fit to go into any country it likes to maintain peace. They did that in Iraq along with the UK but are we seeing peace at work, I think not. If Iran said to the USA "We will stop all nuclear production and dismantle everything if the USA does the same" then the answer from Bush would be no. The USA has nuclear weapons which is fine, but nobody else dare have them for the sake of world peace.
Personally, it would be better if mankind could get rid of them, but you can´t de-invent something.
The middle East is a powder keg, but western countries have to share the blame for that mess. The easiest option has always been war, well if mankind is to survive we need a different solution. For a start we need men of vision on both sides. At this moment in time I see none on the horizon.

Answer 3

As far as Iran pulling the strings, doubt it. As far as them, the shites, getting their munitions from Iran, yes. But not from any official government sources.
Most likely like in all wars, there are always those profiteers who are going to be selling arms to what ever side can come up with the money.
What was it nine ten months ago they were accusing Iran of furnishing arms to the Sunni Al Qaeda?
So that tends to tell me it is arms merchants not the Iranian government furnishing the munitions not the Iranian government.
As far as Iran calling our bluff. After Bush double crossing them. I think it is more on the lines they do not trust us.
I don't know if you know this but Iran initially gave us consent to fly over them to get to Afghanistan. Then Bush started accusing of them of helping the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
Another little know fact is that Iran was having a lot of trouble with the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and were considering invading Afghanistan themselves before 9/11 and we invaded. .

Answer 4

What do I think? I think you should stop believing right-wing propaganda and look at the truth of the matter. The US has launched illegal wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq, two close neighbours of Iran, and refuse to leave. Put your country in Iran's position. Of course they will try to make life as difficult as possible for the illegal occupiers of the neighbouring countries, in order to make an attack on themselves less likely. They are completely entitled to do so.

P.S. I like your neo-con doublespeak. For the sake of peace, we must start a war. Karl Rove would be proud of you!

Answer 5

I think we don't have the troop strength to do it, and I wonder why you aren't complaining about Turkey's incursions into Kurdistan.

I wonder if you know we invaded Iran in 1953 and overthrew their democratically elected leader and installed the murderous Shah. I wonder how long you think we can keep messing with people. I wonder why we have more right to be there in Iraq killing people than does a country that borders them.

Do you think?

Answer 6

What a wide variety of questions. america won't attack Iran quickly. that's a pair of years off. Russia and China will do not something of result, different than perhaps ***** loudly. What ought to they do? Iran would be leveled, despatched returned to the stone age. there'll be no surviving nuclear application. Who else ought to hate us extra effective than they already do actual now? by the time it happens, that's going to look like the only final determination, and governments (however not voters) will realize it. and so as that they are going to bi,,tch to soothe their very own human beings, yet that's all they're going to do. As they did with Iraq. the international desires the U.S. monetary equipment extra effective than we choose them, and that they're going to threat not something in opposition. constantly save in mind that there are 2 entities in any us of a: the folk, and the government. the folk and the governments would protest, yet secretly, maximum governments would be happy to do away with the nuclear threat to Europe. study THIS: Bush heavily isn't the President while it happens. And after tens of 1000's of losses in Vietnam, Republicans had administration of the White homestead returned 7 years after the withdrawal. some human beings over exagerate plausible inner reprocussions, me thinks. basically 3000 infantrymen have died interior the Iraqi conflict, basically 2500 of those wrestle deaths. Iraq not often qualifies as a great conflict for us of a of america to be "unwell of" in any league with Vietnam, Korea, or the two WW, The Civil conflict, conflict of 1812, The Mexican conflict, or maybe The Spanish-American conflict. This era of yank's needs to recover from itself, and study some historic previous. Iraq is a blip, by comparisson to the different American conflict, ever, different than Grenada, GW1, and Panama. Iran would be slightly larger (longer, with much less troops available)conflict than Iraq grew to become into in GW2, yet not extra good a conflict than Iraq grew to become into in GW1. How problematic grew to become into Iraq in GW1? Iran and Iraq fought an 8 3 hundred and sixty 5 days conflict to a stalemate, ending basically 4 years previously GW1. In different words, we defeated Irans final enemy, one Iran fought to a stalemate in 8 years, we kicked there tusshies in approximately 14 days. Iran isn't any tournament for us. human beings, Iran would be a pushover against our protection rigidity, strained or not. The problematic section is preserving, or occupying, a rustic. us of a of america can "beat" and "win" any classic "conflict", definitely, palms down, Iran. yet somewhat Iraq has been high priced.

Answer 7

I think you are another American person that thinks that your country is the most powerful in the world!
You guys mess with Iran and you will be nuked to high heaven!

Answer 8

On its land Iran can do whatever it likes. Iran is not playing around, but is rather handling things that the neo-colonialists accuse it of seriously, which means what the neo-colonialists accuse it of isn't necessarily true.