and fought equally hard for liberalism....would you still call her names?
2007-09-01 19:11:58 · 14 answers · asked by jonnyrotten 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sure. Rosie O'Donnell is a liberal and she's totally whacked. If Coulter was a liberal... I'd say the same thing about her.
As it is, she's a whacked Republican.
2007-09-01 20:32:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
This is a rediculous question. There are plenty of liberals who fight just as hard for liberalism as Coulter does for the Neocons. The thing slander, hatred, and vitriol are the means Coulter uses. That seems to be a tactic of Neocons. People who make a living calling names ("The Witches of East Brunswick") deserves what they get.
2007-09-02 03:01:18 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, because I don't call what she does "fighting hard" for something. I call it the politics of destruction and divisiveness. I would like someone to explain how name calling and turning Americans against each other helps us solve our country's problems or move forward in any way. The last time I checked, we live in the UNITED States of America.
2007-09-02 02:20:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
i completely agree with romare on this. i would dislike her just as much if she was liberal. her way of "debating" an issue is more like a five year old telling yo momma jokes than actual political ideas. she is a complete idiot and she only gets attention because she goes for the shock factor and she yells and insults. this woman does not deserve attention.
2007-09-02 02:25:40 · answer #4 · answered by jessica39 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
If she acted the same way she does now, she would make me embarrassed to be called a liberal.
2007-09-02 02:28:17 · answer #5 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Coulter doesn't "fight hard" for conservatism, she misuses facts, misquotes people, tells outright lies and substitutes name-calling for reasoning.
It's like someone turned up the "shrill-factor" on Limbaugh. Just as ignorant, only louder.
I don't call her names.
She is beneath my contempt.
2007-09-02 02:26:01 · answer #6 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 7⤊ 0⤋
.... i was going to throw in an opinion but................ then i read the other answers. I think i liked what "JackBauer" and lamplighter said lol ............ i agree in part with both.........
she's a bit obnoxious sometimes but she definitly gets her point across. I neither hate nor favour her.......... i'm in the middle............
oh, and by the way...... Bill T's answer was hillarious! Lmao.....
2007-09-02 03:40:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, no one like her could be a liberal. Liberals think, liberals like ideas, liberals don't talk the way she does about anyone.
If she thought she was a liberal and acted in the despicable way she does, I'd say "she doesn't speak for me."
2007-09-02 02:23:33 · answer #8 · answered by master apple 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Yes because she's a mean nasty person who wishes death to anyone who disagrees with her.
2007-09-02 05:52:32 · answer #9 · answered by xg6 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
IF SHE DID WHAT SHE DID ON YAHOO MESSAGE BOARDS SHE WOULD BE A WELL KNOWN TROLL. SHE HAS TROLLED ABOVE AND BEYOND THAT AND TROLLED IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA. SHE'S JUST TRYING TO P*SS PEOPLE OFF AND SHE DOES A GOOD JOB OF IT. SHE'S BEEN A TROLL HER ENTIRE ADULT LIFE.
2007-09-02 02:27:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋