Could we be witnessing evoloutions finest hour?
2007-09-01 18:01:58 · 15 answers · asked by james h 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
No, since no offspring are produced. From a genetic point of view, homosexuality is lethal.
2007-09-01 18:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. Once a male is able to give birth, he is not considered male. In amphibians, for example, gender changes can occur if there is an overabundance of one sex over the other in a particular area.
Besides, the acting on a desire to do something wrong is not a sign of evolutionary change, rather its a sign of moral complacency. Murder is morally wrong and is punished by law. Assault is morally wrong and punished by law. Stealing is morally wrong and punished by law. Homosexuality should be no different. Not because I'm homophobic or because it has become so openly talked about, but because its wrong, plain and simple. I'm tired of being PC about it.
2007-09-02 01:12:09 · answer #2 · answered by firerookie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since homosexuals are less likely to have offspring, they can only ever exist as a 'fringe' group, in an evolutionary sense. The entire population cannot be homosexual, or it would die very quickly (ignoring artificial insemination).
Homosexuality exists in many mammals and even some birds, but always as a small subset of the larger group.
2007-09-02 01:08:38 · answer #3 · answered by lithiumdeuteride 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
lol NOOOO
just because men are being more OPEN about their sexuality (which was also rampant during the ancient Greek times) does not mean we are witnessing evolution to males giving birth. That will never happen and can never happen!
2007-09-02 01:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by Cookie 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
lol never heard that before but I doubt since homosexualitiy has been around since the dawn of man. Read books for once, romans egyptains, greeks and other culutures.
2007-09-02 01:05:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Natures way of stopping the overpopulation of the earth is by creating homosexuals.
2007-09-02 01:07:49 · answer #6 · answered by dxle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because homosexuality isnt genetic, but even if it were, gays are not able to reproduce among themselves, so those "genes" wouldnt pass on to the next generation, and the trait would die with the first gay.
2007-09-02 01:07:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh you deserve a kink in the ar.se with my size 11 for that stupidity.
2007-09-02 01:05:33 · answer #8 · answered by Buddy 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Uhh...no...because it has nothing to do with the development of organs necessary to give birth...
2007-09-02 01:05:10 · answer #9 · answered by bada_bing2k4 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I sure hope not. I agree with Buddy & Troy.
2007-09-02 01:07:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋