What are the odds of two people being married that are the best persons available for the job of President of the United States. Must be like 20 trillion to one, how lucky that they married each other.
2007-09-01 16:12:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Hillary is not the best candidate, In these evil days you need more than a washington profile. You need good judgement, to fight the right fight, admit when you r wrong before you change your position, she talk about she fought for health care for fifteen years and yet she failed. What makes her think she is gonna win now. Yes she has the right motives and yes her resume is extra- ordinary, but if i hire a man or woman with a great reasume and they make wrong decisions in critital times putting my company on the world to failure. then they cant admit they were wrong unless pressured to. They work in my firm for 15 years and coundn't bring change then on the sixteeth year she wants to works in the national firm, even works to lead it. Then she wips at Obama for wanting to go into Pakistan. What will she say if America suffers another attack, God forbid. She will then say we must go after Binladen now so he wont have another chance to attack again. She is silly. Obama is right it is common sense. its like having a man pointing a gun at your wife's head head but you are cursing someone who is saying if someone dont act at stop this man from shooting your wife i will. How foolish can a candidate be. She is basically trying to play it safe and throw sugar at the people but when the fire comes on America we will see the real leader. i mean her no disrespect though. But where is good judgement and common sense. I rather have someone with a history of victory and good judgement than someone with a lot of experience who still end up making un wise descisions.
2007-09-01 18:25:41 · answer #1 · answered by Brown Sugar 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That is Hillary being Hillary, she is not the best Candidate why because she does not want unity within the Democrats running for President neither candidates Obama or Clinton are the best. When watching the debates you only hear Obama Clinton and Edwards. When are we going to hear Dodd Kicinich Gravel. Richardson and Biden are in that boat as well. So until we hear all the candidates on there issues at the debates no Hillary is not the best Candidate.
2007-09-01 21:33:17 · answer #2 · answered by celticpride349 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As a long way as strategically it would no longer be a nasty transfer whilst you suppose of it on phrases of she's already been via a presidential election. Even even though it used to be Bill going to the white condo the primary time, I'm definite she used to be checked out beneath a microscope throughout that election. So any filth they dig up could must be put up invoice and Hillary. If she runs her crusade a precise method she might get round such a lot the bashing, relying how she spins it. If you appear at it on phrases like what's she going to run on then who is aware of. If she manages to faucet into the females's vote she might have a powerful threat of profitable. It makes me marvel how lengthy this target has been in position for her. I wager that if she specializes in what her husband did for the nation and no longer who he used to be as a person then might be in mild of present polls of the country's critiques who is aware of it can be a well transfer for her to run, however plenty can occur among now and 2008. On an fascinating observe it is type of fascinating to observe her engage with the generals on c-span.
2016-09-05 21:12:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well in terms of experiance, I agree with that statement. Hillary led many campaigns as first lady, and has been very active in the senate. In a comparitive stance, I think that she is the best candidate for the job. If we are talking about how I agree with a candidates on the issues, I would throw my support at Kucinich, but as for experiance and being ready to be President, I honestly think Hillary is right there.
I think alot of people are arguing based on the issues. It doesn't matter if you agree with her platform. THis isn't a platform based question; it is about experiance. In comparison to other candidates (Obama, Huckabee, Romney) she has more experiance and would be better prepared for the job. One could however also argue through this question that Guiliani or Gore would be equally apt to fill this position. But regardless, she is the best candidate, not the best person, I would lower those odds to maybe 80 million to one? :)
2007-09-01 18:56:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yep, Bill's the luckiest man in the world that he's married to such an intelligent and forgiving woman. But Hillary's qualifications for the job of President are something she has earned all on her own. She's been training for this job since she won honors in political science at Wellesley, and was working on national committees per Carter's request, long before she ever married Bill. She's got my vote, and if she's elected it will be the American people who just got lucky.
Every candidate says they are the best for the job. What is she supposed to say? "Well, I'd be okay at the job I guess...?"
2007-09-01 18:41:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You're right. The Clintons are lucky to be both smart and endowed with God-given talent and desirable leadership capabilities. They are a rare pair. As to Hillary's claim that she is the best presidential candidate, she was just speaking her mind out loud. Don't they all do that.
2007-09-01 17:30:07 · answer #6 · answered by Belen 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think she is saying she is the best candidate out of all the people running (I don't agree with this by the way). I don't think she's saying the best person in the entire country qualified for the job!
2007-09-01 16:17:42 · answer #7 · answered by trumph 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'd vote for Hillary if she was against the war in Iraq. She goes back n forth saying she's for it then against. I think she'd be a bad president. I have no clue who I'm going to vote for at all yet. I guess anyone is better then Bush though!!! He is the worst presidnet in history!!
2007-09-01 16:28:52 · answer #8 · answered by linz 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They are both so lucky to have one another, I always wondered why their heads looked too big for their bodies - now I know - over abundance of egoitis.
They really need to get over themselves, we can only hope and pray there is never a Clinton in the White House again!
2007-09-01 16:23:56 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
What's so odd about two intelligent, gifted people finding each other?
She may not be the best candidate possible, but she may be the best one running. She's certainly better than any of the Republicans.
2007-09-01 16:18:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋