Beats me but that's the impression I get. When an illegal can go to the head of the line and US military personnel are told to go to the back of the line you've got to know there is something fundamentally wrong going on.
I would say that Dems and liberals are such self-hating Americans that they actually think illegal aliens are above the military. Does their hatred extend that far? The proof is in what they do.
2007-09-01 16:17:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
The democrats love to have as many ignorant voters as possible because it is easier to fool them. The less a person can understand reality the more likely they are to vote for democrats. Those who manage to learn the truth change parties to republican because they understand democrats just talk about being for the poor. Look at all the leaders in the democratic party. Kennedy, Kerry, Clinton, Gore, Edwards and Pelosi. They talk the talk but do not walk the walk. If a poor person gets around them they have their security guards shield them. The only contact Kennedy has with a poor person is when he has to pick up booze at a store on the way home from congress or on the way to congress.
2007-09-01 16:48:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by mr conservative 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
It's quite simple when you think about their 'logic'...
As the Democrats see it, the voting majority of the future is the current crop of illegal immigrants and the children they are having here (natural born citizens). They are cultivating their loyalty now so that once they pass the amnesty bill (under whatever wording they decide to use), they will have an easier time getting them to register as Democrats. All they are really doing is sowing the roots to make sure they stay in power for a long time.
2007-09-01 16:02:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by anna s 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Two things, they pander to the illegals because they see them as a voting block. Being a illegal (or dead) never stopped said person from casting a vote for a Democrat.
Second, the Left despises the military. Just look at who they ran for president in 2004! You can't possibly be more anti-military than John Kerry!
2007-09-02 04:21:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by HJR 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
with the intention to teach entitlement to programmes in the US, electorate are required to have a valid social protection quantity. Many doubt the veracity of the assertions by the Obama administration for the bill by using fact it may desire to comprise a loophole that won't address the variety of documentation required to be produced with the intention to get scientific insurance. If the bill does not have specificity then extremely undocumented workers may well be waiting to acquire scientific well-being coverage, subsequently one won't be able to declare categorically that unlawful immigrants does not be insured. i've got faith we could desire to seem at not what's being reported yet, what isn't being reported. The Obama administration''s extremely valuable "money for clunkers" programme allowed people to purchase vehicles using taxpayer money yet wait, use of a valid social protection quantity replaced into not required. Does that advise undocumented extraterrestrial beings have been waiting to purchase vehicles below this software? Acorn, usual to be professional Obama, replaced into in charge for a fairly valuable voter registration software - a sturdy project. What isn't sturdy is many voted yet, they weren't required to teach they have been eligible to vote and a great form of will possibly not have been legally eligible to vote. that is proving the eligibility that makes me ask your self - that and the actuality that we are discussing what the federal government could pay for - not what the federal government will make the guy states pay for.
2016-10-17 10:55:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, all I know is that I care about people period. I do believe that our laws should be followed, however; if that's the case then many (if not all) of our politicians should be kicked out of office.
After all, isn't it politicians who pass these laws? Democrats aren't the only ones. Republicans do the same thing. They all sleep in the same bed.
2007-09-01 19:29:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
this sounds stupid and i highly doubt it happened that way if at all but what the hell....
oh god youre a republican arent you? jesus christ when will you ppl die out.
anyway i would rather give discounts to both but id probably give it o an illegal immigrant first because they are suffering and trying to find a better life and more opportunity. a soldier will most likely be compensated and be able to support himself one way or another - they have several sources for education and opportunity. the immigrant doesnt.
thats the problem with conservatives like you - the question shouldnt be 'why care more abour foreigners than true americans?'
the question should be 'who cares about human beings in general and who needs help the most? who will be fine on their own?'
2007-09-03 05:13:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gone, Gone, Gone. 4
·
0⤊
6⤋
Simple really.
Liberal Democrats (aka socialists) believe that American citizens have more than they are entitled to.
Consequently they need to even things out between the groups.
Robert M's comments on the future voting blocs is quite accurate.
2007-09-09 07:50:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
ILLEGALS DO NOT DESERVE ANY BENEFITS FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
THEY NEED TO GO TO JAIL OR SENT HOME TO THEIR COUNTRY. ILLEGAL IS ILLEGAL. THATS WHAT THE LAW IS AND WHY WE HAVE LAW ENFORCEMENT.
OUR MILITARY HAVE EARNED ANY AND ALL THEY CAN GET FROM THE GOVERNMENT.
THE GOVERNMENT IS SUPPOSE TO BE BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE.
IF YOU DO NOT KNOW YOUR RIGHTS, YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY.
LET US TAKE CARE OF EACH OTHER FIRST THEN HELP THE PEOPLE IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES. THEY CAN THEN STAY HOME...
2007-09-09 02:05:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by mary 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
A discount? Alot of these people get Free tuition! It is ridiculous!
2007-09-01 16:02:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by RedWhite&Blue 4
·
3⤊
0⤋