I couldn't see anyone being more of a failure than Bush without being run out of the country.
2007-09-01 16:32:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The ultimate failure of Gov. Davis was in how he failed to deal properly with the energy shortage foisted on the state by Enron, Duke Energy, and the other greedy companies that gave him donations.
That, along with an uncanny way of pissing off his supporters.
I can't say that California is any better under Arnold. He's such a suck up to the various power bases out there, nothing he says can be trusted.
A perfect republican candidate, if he wasn't such a social progressive. The religious right won't have a thing to do with him.
2007-09-01 15:18:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Floyd G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evidently, Gray Davis was more of a failure since he was overwelmingly recalled. I know, there is no recall elections for presidents, I also don't believe there would be enough public support for a recall of Pres. Bush. That's my opinion.
2007-09-01 15:14:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by madd texan 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
gray davis gov of cali and state comptroller before that
was less of a failure
2007-09-01 15:15:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by fishshogun 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Never heard of him but how is this question going to bring about the good of anything?
2007-09-01 15:07:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hate to say, but if you are not making it in this economy, you are a loser of such magnitude, suicide should really be at the top of the to-do list.
2007-09-01 15:16:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Is Hillary Clinton more of a man than Bill Clinton?
2007-09-01 15:08:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by biiiiigdooooog 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
You are NOT in charge of passing judgement on anyone!!!
2007-09-01 15:08:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No.
Davis was not re-elected.
2007-09-02 05:05:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the long run, ruining the U.S. is much worse in my eyes.
2007-09-01 15:07:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by oldhag 5
·
1⤊
4⤋