A flip flopper, or someone who's oppinions you dissagree with?
(a legitimate flip-flop must constitute a candidate changing their oppinion, then going back)
2007-09-01 14:00:31 · 11 answers · asked by Allen Carlson 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Otherwise you would only have flipped and not flopped.
2007-09-02 03:20:15 · update #1
Fip Flopper, I wouldn't vote for someone that I disagree with.
2007-09-01 14:33:09 · answer #1 · answered by noidea89 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the flip-flopper had valid reasons for their change of opinion -- such as changing facts and changing circumstances that prompted a different course of action -- then I'd rather vote for them, since they are basing their decisions on the moment -- assuming, of course, that I agree with their decisions most of the time.
I would rarely vote for someone I consistently disagree with -- even a flip-flopper who is changing randomly or irrationally is likely to come to the same conclusion about half the time -- and that's still better than never.
2007-09-01 14:14:01 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If I disagree with someones opinions I will trust them a lot more than a flip- flopper. The person I trust the most I will vote for.
I hate those short concise and vague answers political candidates give. Sounds convincing but upon analysis says nothing in substance.
2007-09-01 14:36:31 · answer #3 · answered by Will 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm voting for Ron Paul no matter what. He doesn't flip flop and I agree with him more than I ever thought possible for any candidate.
2007-09-01 18:42:38 · answer #4 · answered by twilightnomad 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Funny you should ask that, because I was thinking I disagreed with Guiliani on many things, but that I didn't believe Romney on anything whatsoever.
However, I'd rather vote for neither.
2007-09-01 16:47:07 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
someone who goes with what they truly believe in, no matter how misguided it may be. thats why if i have to concede that either obama or hillary are going to win, i would rather have obama win. although thats also kind of tough, because obama doesnt ever really take a stand on anything.
2007-09-01 14:09:37 · answer #6 · answered by djs1184 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Disagree with, at least I would know where they stand.
2007-09-01 14:10:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would not vote for either! Vote for Ron Paul.
2007-09-01 14:08:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
disagree with. at least they present a steady platform.
2007-09-01 14:08:19 · answer #9 · answered by michael f 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
someone i disagree with
2007-09-01 14:08:25 · answer #10 · answered by nnatindahat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋