does this sound feasable, because i thought most things would be melted in the molten lava but i wanted to know whether this would cause any adverse reactions like triggering an erruption and or create more green house gas pollution and or any other type of pollution.
2007-09-01 13:53:24 · 3 answers · asked by curious1 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Earth Sciences & Geology
You got it; they don't burn cleanly; they create more pollution.
Besides you couldn't get close enough safely to do this.
But high temperature incinerators reduce waste to plasma.
2007-09-01 14:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by Robert S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe I didn't think of this myself! The problem might be finding volcanoes that are very active--I'm not sure it would be a good idea to pile garbage into the crater of a volcano that doesn't have exposed magma or lava or whatever it's called when it's still in the mountain.
2007-09-01 14:06:08 · answer #2 · answered by sixgun 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, let's see..................Exactly where do you suggest we put the garbage?
Yellowstone and Kilauea are both active.
2007-09-01 17:07:55 · answer #3 · answered by tropical 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋