It wouldn't be a govt if the leadership did not have control over the populace -- the issue is not whether the leadership CAN control the people, it's whether it DOES control the people.
The closest single term is Libertarian -- where the govt exercises the absolute minimal control necessary to promote the minimal threshold of stability and security -- but otherwise allows people the maximum freedom, provided they don't harm anyone else.
2007-09-01 13:40:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Beware of those who intend government foremost ruled by cowardice, yet pretend such outrageous global influence. The same endure as not mere enemies of people everywhere, but especially as enemies of their own citizens, for that their cowardice and/or apathy remain inexcusable." I Law 12.4.
I Law 12.4, fr. Book of Common Sense, lauded by Heralds, concorded by Regents at Athens during the third Summit of Pokeenan Tous.
2007-09-01 13:48:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Love Ethics 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Utopia? LOL! No, only joking...it is laissez-faire which is French and translates to "let do." It means "a doctrine opposing governmental control of economic affairs beyond that necessary to maintain peace and property rights."
**Who told that guy that this question should have been listed under homework? He must be psychic!**
2007-09-01 13:48:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is Anarchy a form of government?
2007-09-01 13:41:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
France?
2007-09-01 13:59:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know of any. Once laws are passed, the poepe give up control to the leaders.
2007-09-01 13:38:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mob rule?
2007-09-01 14:29:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
minarchy - minimum government
2007-09-01 14:02:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Johan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US.
2007-09-01 14:03:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called anarchy.....
2007-09-01 13:43:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by anteater 3
·
1⤊
0⤋