If a powerful country were to invade a weaker country, overthrow their government and annex them into their nation, would that be considered imperialism or some sort of "forced unification"? Now keep in mind, the newly annexed country would be allowed to vote and elect representatives to serve in the conquering country's legislature, thereby having a voice in the government.
And after you decide whether that is imperialism or unification, tell me whether it would be a good thing or a bad thing.
2007-09-01 12:39:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Well, if Arab counties had not forced out or murdered most of the Arab people from Israel, Israel would now be another Arab country. Israel is a Democracy. God bless America. God bless Israel. God Bless all of mankind regardless of who they are or who they think they are.
2007-09-01 12:52:06 · answer #1 · answered by waynesworldstage 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's imperialism of the weaker country was not originally part of the invading/stronger country.
it's forced unification if the two countries were earlier united, and then became split.
2007-09-01 19:44:24 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Forced unification. Bad thing.
2007-09-01 19:42:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is imperialism and if you pick up a good history book you will read over and over and over again about countries that went bankrupt trying to run imperialist colonies.
2007-09-01 19:49:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are implying what the US is doing to Iraq let's listen to what the President says:
2007-09-01 19:43:19 · answer #5 · answered by FLighthouse 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
empirialism, plain and simple. some empiresm are really quite good, not many though. and not this one.
2007-09-01 19:44:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋