i am curious to know - is the penis glans/head too sensitive to touch w/ hands in males who are uncircumsized, i mean if they pull their foreskin back? also in circumsize males is their glans/head sore b/c they don't have foreskin to protect it? if uncircumsize male get erect, does the glans slide out of foreskin or do he have to pull it back? i dunno, lol....
2007-09-01 11:37:10 · 8 answers · asked by camillabrightside 4 in Health ➔ Men's Health
*this isn't a debate which type is better (they're both penises!) i'm just wanting my q's answered....thanks.
2007-09-01 11:53:52 · update #1
I have heard and seen lots of different things here. The uncirced heads I have touched have been sensitive but not too sensitive to touch, it gives them pleasure. In circumcised males I think it starts off sore without the foreskin, after the operation is done, but stops being sore - because it dries up and they lose sensitivity. (That's the only way to explain how it stops being sore.) About uncircumcised males getting erect sometimes the head naturally pops out and sometimes it is still totally or partially covered, I have seen both ways, depends on the length of the foreskin. The guy I am with now pulls it back.
2007-09-01 20:13:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was circumcised 20 years ago as an adult, in response to my ( then new) wifes strong preference, so I know what it is like "both ways" as it were. In an uncircumcised man the tip of the glans peeps through the foreskin when the penis is erect, but it is not exposed unless he pulls the foreskin back. After circumcision, the glans has less sensitivity to abrasion against clothing etc, but it does NOT lose sexual sensitivity. In point of fact, sex is much better because of more effective intimate contact between the glans and the vagina. The glans also flares out round the rim after circumcision. Circumcision provides better hygiene, comfort, appearance, self-esteem and FAR better sexual sensation during intercourse for both the man and his female partner(s). There are NO disadvantages to being circumcised and I would never want a foreskin again at any price.
2007-09-02 02:35:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I'm intact and i find that my glans is sensitive but feels great to be touched when the foreskin is pulled back. Mt foreskin goes back about halfway along the head when errect but if i pull it back it stays back until it starts getting used (if you know what i mean) then it move like it naturaly should. Some guys it goes back by itself all the way and some it still hangs over the end.
2007-09-02 06:20:25 · answer #3 · answered by darth72au 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
an uncircumsized penis is very sensitive but not usually so sensitive that it can't be touched. most guys love it. when the penis gets hard, it pushes to the end of the foreskin but usually not completely out. a circumsized man does not get sore from not having a foreskin.
2007-09-01 18:45:36 · answer #4 · answered by racer 51 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Yes "circumcised" men get very sore (if they are active men like myself). Very often by the end of my work day my glans feels red hot. I would kill to get my glans protected again (thinking of the damn "dr." that did this to me!). Imagine a scrub brush on your clitoris all day long.
After a few years of this abuse the only thing my penis could feel was dry cloth; my wife's vagina is not made of cloth and is not dry (at least not for the first hour)
A study published in the British Journal of Urology (April 2007) proved that "circumcision" removes the five most sensitive areas of the penis and that no area on a "circumcised" penis compares to that which was cut off. The glans (tip of the penis) is actually the least sensitive area of the penis and that is what is left after "circumcision" for a boy to feel pleasure with. They aren't allowed to remove "only" 75% of a girl's sensitivity so why can they do it to a boy?
Male genital mutilation (circumcision to some of you) does result in anorgasmia (the inability to orgasm from intercourse) in some males; others suffer from delayed orgasm (inability to achieve orgasm before fatigue, most often her fatigue, I might add)
"Circumcision" is mutilation.
2007-09-01 19:08:19 · answer #5 · answered by cut50yearsago 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
It shouldn't be too sensitive to touch. If it is, it's because it's never been touched before. With gradual touching (washing) it would get less sensitive
And yes, the head is revealed when you get erect, most times. Some guys foreskins are longer than others, but you should be able to pull it back yourself with your hand even if it doesn't do it automatically.
2007-09-01 19:00:40 · answer #6 · answered by Jorge 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
It is DEFINATELY more sensitive for guys that are Un-cut. Think oh it this way, If a mans penis is "covered" with foreskin it is protected from exposure unlike a guy that is cut. His head is exposed, rubbing inside his unerpants de-sensitizing it. Is it cleaner? NO.
2007-09-01 18:46:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
I know if a man is not circumsized - their private has extra skin at the end of it and it collect dirth and not too good for sex.
2007-09-01 18:44:13 · answer #8 · answered by yahoooo! 5 · 3⤊ 8⤋