Yes. Leaving will change a lot of things. Other than that, no.
All the US is doing is prolonging the inevitable. Sort of like putting off a major surgery for fear of its outcome, even though, you will surely die if you don't have it.
People are using fear to justify staying there. They used the same fear to put the US in this mess in the first place.
2007-09-01 09:32:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Both yes and no. If anything does change, it will definately take a long time before any kind of change will take place over in Iraq, so the real answer for now is 'no.' If our troops stayed over in Iraq (for example) another 12 years, there will be a slight difference, but not much.
2007-09-01 09:48:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roxas of Organization 13 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What has changed in the region the previous thousand years before we invaded? Our military being in Iraq just gives the crazies in the middle-east a focal point for their hatred, that's it. Iraq makes mission impossible look like a stroll in the park.
2007-09-01 10:09:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe -- it's way too soon to tell who (which faction) is going to come out on top -- or whether multiple different factions and militia groups will end up each controlling separate territories.
It's going to be years before any sort of outcome happens -- and then, it's entirely speculative how long that will last before something else happens.
So, it's like shouting into the wind -- it might make a difference in some small way, or it may get completely lost in the shuffle.
2007-09-01 09:32:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
diplomacy Coordinator Robyn Broughton says His Holiness somewhat had to have interplay with team and scholars. because of the fact the technique of St David is constrained to 500 people, it grew to become into desperate to run a contest to decide for which team and scholars can attend – asking what question they could ask the Dalai Lama. the contest closes on Friday 19 April, yet Mrs Broughton says there has been a superb reaction already from team around the campus. “we've had entries from around the board,” she says. “suitable from PhD pupils to senior administration.” And the questions conceal a spectrum of matters too. “There are rather some around a thank you to realize stability in a hectic existence, rather some around His Holiness’s suggestions around the function of tertiary coaching for youth, some around a thank you to stay valuable, somebody has asked ‘in case you may desire to be an animal, what could you be?’, yet another has asked ‘what's your everyday adolescents memory?’.” the main suitable inquiries to be placed to His Holiness would be chosen by using the national organiser of the Dalai Lama have faith, yet Mrs Broughton believes there will be mixture of great and extra easy-hearted questions. Professor Mark Henaghan of regulation will facilitate the consultation and placed the inquiries to him.
2016-12-12 15:26:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. If we pull out now, it will save lives in the long run. As long as we occupy Iraq, we are more likely to get hit by a terrorist attack. Those people do NOT want occupying their part of the world. It puts American lives in danger.
2007-09-01 09:33:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
No
al-Maliki is a Shiite.
The current President of Iran is a Shiite
al-Maliki was and is supported by al-Sadr, which is hiding out in Iran.
Iran has supported the overthrow of Saddam by the Shiites for years.
Now we are trying to prevent Iran from becoming too friendly with Iraq.
You do the math.
2007-09-01 09:31:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Iraq needs comedy clubs and strip clubs, everybody is so wound up over there!! they need to respect their woman and quit being so intolerant. **** iraq!
2007-09-01 09:43:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Protecting the Iraqi people from terrorists invading from other countries seems like a good first step. Training the local people to provide this service for themselves seems like another.
2007-09-01 09:35:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by distill80 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The cost in lives and resources.
It is a sink-hole for both.
2007-09-01 09:35:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
4⤊
0⤋