Did those that espouse "Support the president" support Bill Clinton with the same fervor?

Question

Or do they suffer from selective support syndrome?

During the 90s, wasn't the GOP and Limbaugh types on a mission to destroy the president at any cost? Didn't they harp more on the Clintons then they did on Bin Laden?

BTW I agree whole heartily with Clinton's impeachment. He earned it. Don't agree with the $66 million spent that led up to it.

driveranderson (below) Good examples.

Question, do you also turn your laser sights upon all that is bad within the Bush admin, or do you conserve your batteries for Dems only?

For if you care for the country then all bad acts would be the subject of your research. If you only care for the Repub party then you would turn a blind eye to the current admin. Which is it?

Answer 1

Yes clinton full-filled every duty of the president so well,



1. Chief of state - Failed, Impeached

2. Chief executive - Failed, 140 pardons in 1 day

3. Chief administrator - Failed, chared with obstruction of justice

4. Chief diplomat - Failed, Mideast peace

5. Commander in Chief - Failed, huge decline in moral

6. Chief legislator - Failed, reform of health care

7. Chief of party

8. Chief citizen - Failed, Scandal

Answer 2

I don't doubt that some that did. There are people that refuse to question or challenge authority, no matter who holds power or what is done. Sad, I know, but unfortunately true.

Not even everybody in the Republican party supports everything Bush did, just like not everybody in the Democratic party supported everything Clinton did.

Yes, there were many that attempted to bash and destroy the presidency of Clinton during the 1990s; some of the attacks were justified and some were not. But I personally don't know anybody (nor ever heard of anybody) who shouts "support the president" when referring to Bush and also shouted "support the president" when referring to Clinton.

Answer 3

I spent quite a few dollars in the day to impeach Clinton and I was on a mission to take him out, However my reason for doing it was due to Waco, Chineese contributions, Craig Livingstone and the FBI files, the billing records in the White House, and last Monica Lewinsky and Clintons shabby treatment of women in general. Bin Laden was under wraps because the syncophants in the press kept bad news hidden as much as possible. Funny the truth came to light in the New York times that confirmed Path to 9/11 was correct and you can't get it on DVD because Clinton an Co. are still censoring it.

Answer 4

Nope, they made claims that Clinton trying to kill Osama, was just a ploy to cover up his Lewinsky thing.

Answer 5

Is only bad when a Democrat does it but when one of their own does it, is good.