I used the word disappointing instead of 'worst' because i don't think you can call a tournament like world cup 'worst'.
Well i have seen the last three world cups almost completely that is the 99,03 & 07 world cups but i have good enough info of other
6 world cups from 75 to 96.
Personal opinion-
1) Most well organised world cup = 2003 WC in South Africa
2) Best World cup = 1992 ( I believe that was the most competitive world cup ever. There wasn't any domination by 1 or 2 teams in it, but 5-6 teams played good tough cricket in it)
3) Most disappointing = 2007 WC with Australia dominating it completely. The most disappointing thing about this WC was that out of 50 plus matches in it only 3 matches were close matches & they were-
Zim v/s Kenya, RSA v/s Sri Lanka & there was one more which i forgot, Lol!!!!!!!
2003 was also poor but there were a lot of good matches in it.
What's your opinion?
2007-09-01 08:49:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
Watch this cool video of mine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTp0ww68fR8
2007-09-01 17:01:40 · update #1
You stop saying cheater Gilchrist. You need to see the mirror, nalaka
2007-09-02 17:31:50 · update #2
2007 worst cuz Cheater gilchrist & rasist Australia
.
& i guess 1983 the best .
2007-09-02 12:49:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Best WC so far, by farthest 1992.
Worst was 2007.
Most disappointing was 2007, not only because India and
Pak did not make it, but also the death of coach Woolmer.
Aussies were ruthless since 1999 and there is no team today
that can beat them in a series.
2007-09-05 08:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by JustDoit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2007
2007-09-03 23:44:28 · answer #3 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World cup 1992 Australia was the best and world cup 2007 west indies was the worst for death of Pakistan coach Bob Wolmer.
2007-09-01 10:08:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I consider 1983 world cup, in which underdogs India caused upset victory over the giant 2 times champion West Indies and won the world cup as the best and 2007 world cup which saw many upsets in the group stages and controversial final as the most disappointing world cup.
2007-09-01 11:32:54 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the last 3 world cups have been the best,purely because I'm AUSTRALIAN and we achieved something that will be very hard for other teams to repeat-3 world cups in a row, plus we stretched our lead as the most successful odi side in the world with the most world cups 4,and i don't think it will be our last :)
2007-09-02 19:38:09 · answer #6 · answered by FORKY 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the best world cup was 1992
disappointed world cup was 2007
2007-09-01 18:23:31 · answer #7 · answered by raja a 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1992 is the best and 2003 is the worst .
2007-09-04 00:47:06 · answer #8 · answered by max g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1987 - close final, aus v eng
1999 - brilliant semi final, aus v saf
1992 - good matches, wasims brilliant final spell
2007 - Gilchrists final, but 2 weeks too long, woolmers death
1996 - bombings and boycotts, ind v sl semi disgrace
2003 - too political
overall maybe '99 was the best, but you cant blame aussies for being too good in '03 and '07, its everybody elses responsibility to be more competitive.
2007-09-01 13:41:42 · answer #9 · answered by champ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2007 worst & 1999 the best . The best match beig SA v/s AUS semies
2007-09-01 19:14:32 · answer #10 · answered by ronny shetty 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋