Are not Rosie O and Ann Coulter opposite sides of the same extremist coin?

Question

Do they both not depend on radical supporters to validate their extreme points of view?

Tom C (below) This rare event is going into my journal. LOL

Thanks for all of your responses BTW even though I give you crap most of the time. Mostly in fun. (Mostly) LOL

Answer 1

Answer: Aside from the fact that Ann is sane and Rosie, much like yourself is...NOT!
If you want extremists...follow Rosie.

Answer 2

"Rosie is a performer who uses her celebrity to expouse inane ideas. She did not earn her right to comment on TV due to her intellectual firepower, like Ann Coulter did. Example: Rosie said that "fire can't melt steel" claiming that means that the twin towers were brought down by explosives. In fact fire can melt steel as in a furnace. This is one of the problems with our media - giving loony celebrities like Rosie a platform to use."

Hey moron,
Fire did not melt the steel pf the WTC1, 2 and 7 sufficiently enough to cause the demolition style collapse of all three trade center buildings.

Rosie woke up this past year, and she did her best in her position of The View to wake up others still in the illusion of Terrorists attacking on 9/11.

Anne Coulter is starch Neo-Con. Still trapped in the 2 sided illusion of Republican Vs. Democrat, two sides of the same coin.

Answer 3

I would have compared Michael Moore and Ann Coulter. They're both sort of funny some of the time, and they both say things they know are untrue and outlandish to try to make a point or get attention. Rosie O'Donnell is an entertainer who is outspoken on political issues, not a full-time political commentator.

Answer 4

Yeah, I already know what you'll think of this, given the fact that the other two questions you don't like are hidden due to a low rating.
No, they're not. They are on opposite sides of two separate coins, with Ms. Coulter on the heads side of the one, and Rosie on the tails side of the other, but stuck in gum on the sidewalk, and trying to eat it.

Answer 5

I guess that you could say that.......but I think that Ann is a little more researched into what she believes in. She has wrote books and had interviews with all the top tier journalists like larry king, she is a frequent on talk shows and newspaper articles alike. She is a lawyer and a very educated woman.

Rosie on the other hand has accused the government of setting up 911 on purpose.......and with what loony facts, none she is just a talk show host/comedian who found out that people actually listen to her when she is loony

Answer 6

No because Rosie is an uneducated comedian and Coulter, even though I disagree with her on some major issues, has a background in law and politics.

Answer 7

Enjoyed Rosie's contribution in A League of Their Own .... but has she many original sane thoughts since then ?

You may not agree with Ann's politics but she is an intelligent woman who can effectively communicate a message.

Answer 8

When I first read your first responder say that Ann C. is mainstream Conservative, I thought he was crazy. In retrospect, I think I have to agree with him. and that is very, very frightening for this country.

some of the other answers have confirmed that.

Thomas M made a good point. Rosie is just a Hollywood Personality. She really has no credibility. Ann Coulter is a political pundit with her own column and guests on several radio and t.v. shows as a "political expert". That makes Ann's hate and disinformation very dangerous.

Answer 9

Rosie is a performer who uses her celebrity to expouse inane ideas. She did not earn her right to comment on TV due to her intellectual firepower, like Ann Coulter did. Example: Rosie said that "fire can't melt steel" claiming that means that the twin towers were brought down by explosives. In fact fire can melt steel as in a furnace. This is one of the problems with our media - giving loony celebrities like Rosie a platform to use.

Answer 10

I don't like either of them. Don't get me wrong Rosie is a nut case but at least she does not go around calling people gay when she does not know that it is true. Ann acts like she is in fifth grade. She makes thing up about people that are not true...calling Bill Clinton gay and John Edward a "*****." She does this just to spite people and get attention when saying those things is not necessary and whenever she is proven wrong she acts like a child and she does not listen she just blabs on and on about another subject that is not even relevant.