Let integer k >= 2.
2^(2k) - 1 = (2^k)^2 - 1
2^(2k) - 1 = (2^k)^2 - 1^2
2^(2k) - 1 = (2^k + 1)(2^k - 1)
For k >=2, (2^k + 1) >= 5 and (2^k - 1) >= 3
Both of these are distinct integer factors not equal to 1.
Thus, 2^(2k) - 1 is not prime. QED
2007-09-01 07:24:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by richarduie 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
2^(2k) -1 = (2^k+1)(2^k -1). It's the difference of
two squares and if k >=2, 2^k -1 > 1.
So 2^(2k) -1 is never prime.
2007-09-01 08:26:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by steiner1745 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
2^(2k)-1
= (2^k + 1)(2^k - 1)
Since 2^(2k)-1 can be factored into two integers, 2^(2k)-1 is never prime.
2007-09-01 07:12:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by sahsjing 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
How do you realize lim_{ok->infty} tan(ok)/ok has no cut back? From some attempting out for okay to up 100000000, it form of feels limsup tan(ok)/ok is approximately a million, so heuristically i could assume the s(n) to be at genuinely the worst merely n, which does no longer provide convergence. yet this is a awful estimate provided that very few ok's have tan(ok) ~ ok---say at worst a million in the type a million to n? with something being at worst tan(ok) ~ a million---which might provide convergence. in case you have a fashion for computing limsup {ok->infty} tan(ok)/ok, that could desire to probable be amplified to make those assertions rigorous, hence my question above.
2016-12-12 15:19:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only prime even number is 2.
2007-09-01 07:14:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nyx Stefanus 1
·
0⤊
3⤋