English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

........if he didn't already have half of the money?

I think he would. I don't vote for anyone but if I did it would have probably have put me off voting for him thinking that it would be nicer if someone else got some money too.

Was that fair of BB to criple someone's chances of winning like that?

2007-09-01 02:23:56 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Television Reality Television

I know he's made up with having the money but I bet he's sitting there wondering if he could have won without the money in his pocket. I'm not saying he'll be devastated but imagine if you'd been on BB and will always have to wonder IF you could have won?

2007-09-01 02:35:10 · update #1

22 answers

I kind of think so,but Iam swayed,I think either way he would have liked to win but you still get the same fund so even if he does fade out some time he'll still have something.But also being up against Brian and Samanda was hard enough,but it's true people held the fact that he already won the money against him so this did affect his odds.

2007-09-01 03:02:54 · answer #1 · answered by Classy Clarissa 7 · 1 0

I would not have wanted to win the money so early on in BB cos I'd def think it'd ruin my chances of potentially winning.
Liam may have got more votes if he hadn't have won the money but I still think he'd have finished in 3rd place. The twins & Brian were too strong a contender for liam to have won against them.

2007-09-01 04:25:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think he would have got more votes but i think Brian woud have still won!

As for BB ruining Liams chances of winning, i don't think he cared if he won or not.

I personally was really glad Brian won although i liked all the housmates that were in the final.

2007-09-01 04:54:39 · answer #3 · answered by Angel 2 · 1 0

You have a good point Buttecup but I don't think so - it was always the twins and Brian and I think people really love Brian and nothing could have stopped him winning. The money shouldn't have made any difference anyway because it is about personality and entertainment factor which Brian won hands down.

2007-09-01 03:14:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes I think he would of had more chance.
I also think hed of had more chance if he hadnt of got jiggy with that tart...Amy.
He should of come nearer to winning than the dippy twins.At least he had some intelligence and personality.

It wasnt really fair of BB but thats the name of the game...and will liam really care he's already got £100,000 and I bet he was just releived to get out of there and have a beer and a who's your father when he wants
lmao

great ques tho.have a star.
xx

2007-09-01 02:31:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Yes I think so. I think the top four (or 3 if you count the twins as one) would have been very close indeed. Any of them could have won really, and as Liam won the money previously, I think it just swayed people's decisions

2007-09-01 02:28:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I agree,but as for crippling chances of others,at the end of the day most of them will make a lot of money anyway.I dont think these days its so much about winning,but who can get the best deals when they come out.

2007-09-01 02:29:22 · answer #7 · answered by Freakin 6 · 4 0

Interesting point - I was thinking that. He may not have won, but I bet he would have got a lot more votes and possibly finished second.

2007-09-01 03:31:56 · answer #8 · answered by weezfinder 2 · 1 1

He didn't haveto accept the money did ... I bet h would have won if he refused to accept it ... and said that he didn't think it was fair...

that would have crippled everyone else's chances


dR bad
and ensured he won...

2007-09-01 08:25:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes I do believe he would have but i still think Briab will have won x

2007-09-01 04:46:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers