English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should the illegal, unethical and downright unethical and un-American things that Hillary has done be more publicized in the Media.... Or should we continue to pretend we don't know about her stealing whitehouse furniture, selling nights in the Lincoln bedroom, belittling and abusing staffers, soldiers, secret service, etc.....

Why is this person being given the time of day by Americans???? How soon we forget....

2007-08-31 18:37:35 · 17 answers · asked by Born in the USA 3 in Politics & Government Elections

Elway... I persieve you to be a rational person who is utterly missguided....The truth "if you will look into it" may hurt a bit...I am certainly not a REPULICAN.... But I a US Citizen who has taken the time to look into the details and can honestly say this woman is dangerous and has NO Patriotism or compassion I think her to be a socieopath.... If you'll do some research you'll see what I mean...

Good Luck to you.

2007-08-31 19:10:10 · update #1

17 answers

The Democrats don't want to say anything, but once she gets the Democratic nomination watch the facts hit the fan.

2007-08-31 18:50:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Of course, but the other candidates also need to start talking about them. She's not going to mention them herself, and no one's going to listen to you. The thing is, all her democrat opponents are gaming for running mate. And as soon as the republican candidate mentions it, democrats everywhere will exclaim, "Of course a republican is going to tell lies like that!"

2007-08-31 19:19:59 · answer #2 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2 0

They were pretty much hashed to death a decade ago -- very little is accomplished by dragging them out again now.

Anyone who cares still remembers, and anyone who doesn't probably doesn't care.

Allegations and accusations are cheap -- and very little was proven that was her specifically -- which means if she gets blamed for what someone else does, that's just guilt by association -- which is nothing more than a political ploy.

2007-08-31 18:44:57 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 2

It is difficult to even picture that a book can assist people to change their fates but } countless guys and females, people that they have actually benefitted in a big

2016-05-15 16:02:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

What illegal activities and scandals? Most of those so-called "illegal activities" and "scandals" were created by the Republicans. They conducted a six year witch hunt and spent millions trying to prove something, ANYTHING, against Bill and Hillary, and they failed miserably. And which was it, were the Clintons too smart for them, or the Repubicans that incompetent? Either way, it doesn't make them look too great. They couldn't even gather enough evidence to get a fricking indictment.

Yet now, they talk about these things as though they were proven, and as though it's a fact that her and Bill are criminals guilty of everything from garden variety corruption to murder. Where's the PROOF? Whatever passes for "facts" about the Clintons among conservatives doesn't include anything as mundane as indictments and convictions. Pah! Who needs convictions to call people criminals? Assumption is as good as proof to a conservative when it comes to the Clintons.

Except here's the problem. You guys are yapping about this crap constantly and no one is paying attention but you and your kind. You are preaching to your own choir. The American people have had smear tactics and character assassination tactics from the Republicans right up to their eyeballs. You guys keep this garbage up and you might as well not show up to vote in November '08.

EDIT:

Please, stop making assumptions. I have done my homework and looked into all these never proven accusations. There is a reason they were never proven, and if you wish to ignore that it can't be helped. Your patronizing tone suggests you know something I don't. You are wrong about that, I've heard all this garbage before and investigated every allegation. For example:

The stolen furniture/silverware story? Not true:

...Bush propaganda machine and the full array of Clinton haters continued their daily assaults on the ex-president, attacking his pardons, gifts he'd received in the White House, his proposed New York office building, and allegations that his staff had trashed the White House after leaving office.

...the stories of White House vandalism were greatly exaggerated, the claim of theft on Air Force One was pure disinformation, Clinton's gifts were not significantly larger than those of Reagan and Bush senior.

Bush's White House would leak rumors to friendly journalists, or those managing rightwing Web sites such as the Drudge Report, and the stories would quickly circulate and be taken up by the mainstream media; there would then be days of impassioned discussion, and eventually reputable newspapers such as the New York Times would publish stories deflating claims, for example, that the departing Clintonites trashed the White House or took mementos from Air Force One. Reporters looking into Clinton's last days in the White House did not find that he took any more gifts or objects from the White House than his predecessors, and W. himself was forced to concede that there was no truth to the rumor that the Clintons had stolen items from Air Force One on their last trip. But the damage had been done, and the Bushites were able to present themselves as a "clean" and virtuous contrast to the departing Clinton administration.

http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/GT2c11.htm

The Clinton Hit List? Been debunked a long time ago:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

The really ridiculous Hillary Clinton/Black Panther story? More b.s.:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/panthers.asp

And on and on and on. You may not be a Republican but in talking about Hillary Clinton you have taken a page directly from their smear playbook. You might as well be one if you are willing to accept conjecture as fact with no proof. That's a Republican trait if there ever was one.

2007-08-31 18:58:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

all politicians are like the rest of us - we have all done things we are not proud of. In fact give me a perfect person to govern us and you will be living in a fools paradise.

2007-08-31 19:01:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Accusations are just like opinions is my thought. If she went to court and was found guilty of what you say, then yes, it should be brought up again. Until then, innocent until proven guilty......... (no matter if flawed)

2007-09-02 06:12:04 · answer #7 · answered by peggy m 5 · 0 0

All of that is minor compared to the fact that she has promised to violate the Bill of Rights when she is elected.

2007-09-01 01:50:02 · answer #8 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 2 0

Actually most of the scandals were only rumors, not proven. Only the Fixed News Network's Bill Oh'Really ever thought they were true.

2007-09-01 03:35:09 · answer #9 · answered by Allen Carlson 2 · 0 2

That is so petty compared to the illegal activities that Bush is getting away with.

Maybe you should put your energy into trying to impeach Bush for his illegal war crimes.

2007-09-01 03:43:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers