Is it true that women are biologically superior to men?

Question

If so, it must be caused by the strain after a (good) f**k. We men are tired and very hungry afterwards. Do women get away with our male energy in fact? I tell myself: what the heck, let it be; after all they also have to carry new life for the survival of the human race.

Answer 1

Try asking your mom

Answer 2

Well, it is true biologically superiority is there for women until they stop menstruating that is (menopause). The female hormones especially oestrogen is supposed to help women to age a few degrees slower than men.
For example if two children of almost identical date of birth are there, till 45 - 50 both may be chronologically same, but biologically the woman has not aged that much as a man has.
The difference is (mine subjectively), about 5-10 years.
So much so, at age 70 or so the man is quite debilitated physically, but the woman is still about 55 - 60. No wonder women outlive men and are quite active and healthy well past 70 and 80 while men all die off in the early 80's There are exceptions ofcourse, but they are quite a minority. Check it out with all people you know.

Answer 3

Women have always had longer life spans than men, even now. We are capable of multi tasking, where as men are not so capable. We have a higher tolerance to pain than the male, which is a biological fact. Nature needs women to survive so that we can breed and produce the next generation. If you want to reduce the population, kill off the women.

Answer 4

It's not just feminists - it's social constructionists. With regard to male and female behaviour and specifically, their 'predispositions' o r'inherent nature', these are things that have not been proven in science. Perhaps its best first to describe to you the difference between Sex and Gender. Sex is the biological term given to the people based on their genitals, i.e., male or female, but gender is a different thing altogether, and refers to the extent to which we identify with social constructions of what it means to be masculine or feminine. There are numerous theories that attempt to explain gender and gendered behaviours. These often conflict and reflect the common view of masculinity and femininity of the time. The argument is that gendered behaviours are reactions to power structures, e.g., Capitalism, Patriarchy, families demands, working culture, and institutions (e.g., schools) etc. The media, texts, history, popular culture and social structures influence how gender is constructed and reproduced. The social constructionist (and feminist) view is that using the terms 'masculine' and 'feminine' in reference to behaviours and characteristics is problematic because they imply that there is a pre-determined baseline as to what counts as 'normal' behaviour for either sex. For example, leadership qualities are often described as ‘masculine’ behaviours and caring qualities are described as ‘feminine’. why not just call them leadership qualities and caring qualities? You wouldn't say that being assertive is an Asian behaviour, or that being kind is a Caucasian behaviour. They are just traits that any race can have. The distinction between male and female traits has been maintained for so long due to the relationship that men and women must always have since they rely on each other for sex and procreation, and very often, love and affection. For a smooth family life, it is easier to justify the woman's place in the family if she is believed to be inherently caring, and to justify the man's place as the breadwinner if he is seen as inherently assertive. This relationship has led to a perpetual imbalance in power between men and women and is the determining factor for gender stereotypes that are disguised as real observations of the 'inherent' or genetically determined nature of males and females.

Answer 5

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Men don't think women are superior, they are just completely willing to lie about their beliefs if it will get them laid.

There is though a Chinese belief that the male energy of Yang is absorbed by women during ejaculation. When the woman climaxes the man absorbs the female energy of Ying. (or Yin)

So the trick for the man is to make sure the woman climaxes at least once before he ejaculates, or even better, learn how to climax without ejaculating, so he can take the woman's energy over and over and over.

Strangely, no mater how many times they climax, Chinese women do not seem to object to this duplicitous and unreciprocated theft of their energy. Go figure.

BTW if this seems like a technique you'd like to learn. Pick up a book called "The multi-orgasmic man".

This will give you the kudos you want in the eyes of your lover, and you won't have to go on line to brag about having good sex. ;-)

Go get 'em, Tiger.

Answer 6

the ability to carry a child nine months and be wholly responsible for its development in the womb does make us biologically superior to men. to feel the baby kick inside you is something a man will never experience. and to be able to deal with pmt, periods and all that comes with it makes us superior. overall us women are great :-)

Answer 7

Well biologically speaking they would seam to have a more interesting parts list. As an inferior man I am dedicating my life to their study.

Answer 8

No. For our advantages, we have equal disadvanages. It does seem a bit PLANNED, that our disadvantages are all of the men's advantages. Making Women the Yin to his Yang.

Answer 9

No, they are not superior in the most general of senses. And neither are we to them. This question is completely relative, plz add more information...What area of human biology are you asking about.

Answer 10

women can do anything men can and produce life~ I guess that mine mean ~ they are

Answer 11

The only thing a woman has that is superior to a man is her jaw muscles from all the JABBA JABBA NAG NAG NAG!! jesus dont they ever shut up!!!!???