There is a lot of proof that she can't get the job done. I agree with you 100%. As a man, I would vote for a woman for President, but Hillary is NOT it.
2007-08-31 16:00:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dude 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
So, your going to choose the new pres by how far she is on the list? for Pete's sake, some of these women are chosen on the list as financial backers, wealthy, large corporation VIP's and other places like this, that doesn't mean they could be the new president.
Other then Condolance Rice, Hillery is the only politician and the only one interested in being a President, the others don't want anything to do with it, they're to busy with their own Private ventures.
2007-09-01 00:40:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by cowboydoc 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Hillary becomes President (leader of a country) then expect her rating to rise, she did well considering that she's currently only a senator. It's notable that she did finish ahead of Pratibha Patil (President of India), Nancy Pelosi (house speaker), New Zealand's Prime Minister Helen Clark, Finland's President Tarja Halonen, and Philippines president Gloria Arroyo.
It's not a bad reflection on Hillary if a few ALREADY powerful heads of state etc placed ahead of her, for example Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, China's vice premier Wu Yi. These women did well after given a chance in their positions, Hillary is eminently qualified and deserves the opportunity to show what she can do as President.
2007-08-31 22:28:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
The problem with Hillary's power projection is not that she doesn't have any. The problem lies in the fact that the Islamic countries she will be dealing with don't generally recognize the value of women outside of the home. To have a woman sent to them as a diplomat (such as the case of Madelaine Albright; who also, curiously enough, is Jewish) is laughable. To have a Jewish woman sent to them is downright antagonistic. It's no wonder the Judao-Palestinian Conflict is still raging on. Hillary will have no better luck in this arena.
2007-09-01 01:31:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by LRP 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think she is the right candidate for the job. It will just be Bill running the scenes from behind.
2007-08-31 21:03:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think man or woman, you need to have military experience to be Commander in Chief and she does not have that. So I find it hard to support her.
2007-08-31 21:09:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kiss my Shaz 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
is this about exploiting people to get rich, or about leadership.
2007-08-31 22:02:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋