English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Define the following terms by consulting a dictionary: capitalism, socialism, & communism. Based upon the definition of these terms, what elements of each are present in Utopia?

i already got the definitions... i just need help with the 2nd part of the questions... please help me, somehow! i'd appreciate it!

2007-08-31 13:34:29 · 7 answers · asked by Arikashikari_Peace 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

THANK YOU ALL FOR HELPING ME~ I FINALLY GET THE ANSWERS... HOWEVER, PSYENGINE KINDA CONFUSED ME.. ^^;;; AGAIN, THANK YOU SOOO MUCH! I LOVE YOU GUYS~

2007-08-31 14:50:21 · update #1

7 answers

As far as I know.. it's socialism that is concerned with utopia...

It states that the resources are equally distributed to each and every person.. It is the equality that concerns utopia

2007-08-31 13:40:31 · answer #1 · answered by Grand Phuba 5 · 0 0

Utopia Consulting

2016-12-18 13:41:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Communism and socialism are the same thing, communism is the extreme of socialism. Utopia is mainly thought of a socialist/communist place because they strive for a society CONTROLLED BY THE STATE, and goods/services are EQUALLY DISTIBUTED among the people. It is capitalist in the way that there would be a PERFECT MARKET with no market failure.

2007-08-31 13:42:00 · answer #3 · answered by Shane Kirk. 3 · 1 2

Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.

Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the public with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).

Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.

Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.

Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents and false government.

2007-09-03 03:19:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Capitalism's free market would belong in a utopia. Freedom is good.
Socialism's lack of classes would also belong. Classes create inequality, hate, etc.
And communisms equality of incomes, or, rather, the no poverty aspect of it. While maybe not everybody would have equal incomes, everybody would have no problem staying well over the poverty line.

2007-08-31 13:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by Jo'Dan 3 · 1 3

First, the definition of Utopia from Merriam -Webster online:

1. an imaginary and indefinitely remote place

Each of your "isms" HOPES to come closest to Utopia by providing all things to all inhabitants. Since THAT is not possible, Utopia remains "imaginary"... As defined...

2007-08-31 13:59:44 · answer #6 · answered by BobAndrews 5 · 0 5

Let's start from nothing. Firstly the Judgment of being human is negative and therefor can not be removed from consciousness, i.e. there is no perfection. Secondly the Will is positive and immanent in our nature, it is what is naturally or innately desirable and is universal for all humans, though the specific forms of the objects for the Will differ in their outward appear, their essential abstracted description as purpose is the same.

What is the same in all three is in reality all three have class and competition, though in wish-fullness in some people they as idea all differ in respect to presence or absence of class and competition, reality presents no proof of or for such perfection.

see the following link: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm

Karl Marx
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Private Property and Communism

(final two paragraphs) 'Atheism, as the denial of this unreality, has no longer any meaning, for atheism is a negation of God, and postulates the existence of man through this negation; but socialism as socialism no longer stands in any need of such a mediation. It proceeds from the theoretically and practically sensuous consciousness of man and of nature as the essence. Socialism is man’s positive self-consciousness, no longer mediated through the abolition of religion, just as real life is man’s positive reality, no longer mediated through the abolition of private property, through communism.

Communism is the position as the negation of the negation, and is hence the actual phase necessary for the next stage of historical development in the process of human emancipation and rehabilitation. Communism is the necessary form and the dynamic principle of the immediate future, but communism as such is not the goal of human development, the form of human society. [34]'

Possessing property of any kind in its most positive spiritual form is that property formed of the personalities own abilities. Land property can never have taken from it the property of the Creation, that property is the sole property of the Creation, but the labour to protect as a private possession Creations property adds to its property a humanness which may only be judged, for its owner can not possess it by mere Will alone.

The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.

Class according cognitive achievement, competition according contingent-demand, changing needs and changing individuals. Extended right to property, not extendable right to property, democracy versus dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.

2007-08-31 14:06:59 · answer #7 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers