i reckon so. i think 'they' didn't want the mother of the future king of England to be married to a Muslim.
2007-08-31 13:00:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by val f1 nutter 7
·
7⤊
2⤋
don't know for sure, but you can make a couple of assumptions.
Firstly, if Dianna had lived, how where the royals going to reconcile the fact that Dianna (as is strongly rumoured) was pregnant?
No big thing, you might say, however, if Dodi was the father , then you have to remember that Dodi's uncle id Adnan Khashoggi, Khashoggi is probably the worlds most successful gun runner and arms supplier.
The royals would then have two future heirs to the throne, who by blood, are related to this gun runner.
Al Fayed himself is in fact a very devious and underhand person.
Having swindled over $1bn from the accounts of the Sultan of Brunei, he then began a clever deception to defraud Tiny Rowlands of his shares in House of Fraser (Lohnro, the parent company of Harrods). This swindle was backed and supported by the then Thatcher Tory government.
Fayed was viewed by the tory government with great esteem, as he had been instrumental in persuading the Sultan Of Brunei to leave his fortunes invested in the UK, at a time when the finances of the country were in dire straights.
Could the royals have lived with these facts?
Also remember that if the child of Doddi had been born, then the childs grandfather (Al Fayed) would have been a slight relation to the royals.
The child of Doddi would have had British citizenship and could have claimed the same right for it's grandfather.
Oh what a tangled web they weave!
2007-09-01 08:49:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
it was Al Fayed's security that killed Diana and Dodi. He was driving to fast and crashed the car.
He is just trying to shift the blame on to other people.
Why does he not just let it rest now it has been 10 years and people are not really interested in his accusations that the Royals / goverment had diana topped.
2007-09-01 05:20:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has been in all of the newspapers: THE DRIVER WASN'T DRUNK!!! It is official, that is the toxicology report.
Why do you think there have been so many delays and changes in the trial? Why do you think that this "transparent" trial is witholding documents? Why were ALL of the cameras at the tunnel out of order for that one night? Why do you think that there are questions in the first place?
I don't think that we will ever know the truth, but I think that yes he is right and he should do everything he can to find out the truth.
By the way, I am not a conspiracy theorist, I just know a blatant coverup when I see one.
Honestly, do you really think that the royal family would tolerate a muslim in their family?
2007-08-31 20:05:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by greenfan109 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
I don't believe we will ever know the truth, and I don't have much faith in this new inquest to be done next month either. How can it possibly say anything other than that she died from an accident! Do you really believe the royals will go for that?
After watching some of the memorial service today, and seeing Prince Phillip sit with his arms crossed over his chest it made me wonder just how much he DIDN'T like her!
Enough to have her killed??
2007-09-01 00:26:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by djc1175 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe they were murdered.
The Royal Family would not have wanted Diane to marry Dodi or have his children.
I believe they were both murdered to prevent the relationship from going any further.
I also believe they wanted to shut Diane up permanently.
Again like the JFK and Marilyn Munroe thing...we will never know the true story.
2007-09-01 04:01:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by laplandfan 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
probably, more than likely.
the royal institution couldn't stomach the possibility of diana marrying a muslim, it would mean william & harry would have had step-arab brothers & sisters, that was just too much for them to bear.
With the present situation over muslim extremists & moderates, imagine the role she could have held as an ambassador between the two?
instead of her doing as she was told & blend back in the obscurity she'd been picked from, as she was only after all a baby incubator to provide the house of windsor with an heir!
they simply underestimated the public feeling over diana, it scuppered their perfect plans & i bet charlie really really regrets ever falling for the pressure they must have put him under to marry diana & have babies!
2007-09-01 03:09:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes there is no doubt about it, don't get me wrong everyone has a right to their own opinion but why has everyone with a speck of evidence gone back into the woodwork. Also where is Trevor Reece - Jone she seems to have disappeared thanks again to her royal majesty and charlie boy. I think myself that his father prince Phillip had something to do with Diana's death and I will believe that until I die.
2007-09-04 09:34:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by stardu5t7 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you think about it logically.
If Diana was pregnant then the future king of England, head of the church of England's brother/sister along with his step father and possible mother all practising Muslims?
Never in a million years.
2007-09-01 08:28:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by st.abbs 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
well theres a lot of strange stuff after she died, like all the cameras in Paris, all 18 of them were out that night, then theres the flash in the tunnel saw by other motorists, ? the white car? henri supposed drunk? so I dont think it was a accident, and mr jones Dianas body guard has never spoke about that incident has he
2007-09-01 03:21:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥**•.¸¸verbalkint♥**•.¸¸ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion, it was a car accident ands that's all there is to it. Henri Paul may not have been drunk (tests have revealed otherwise?) but drunk or not it was still just a tragic accident. If anyone wanted her dead,I think it would have been done differently and not a car accident as that wouldn't guarantee the targets dying.
2007-09-01 02:12:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by Nickynackynoo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋