2007-08-31 11:07:41 · 10 answers · asked by iaskwhy2007 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I have to admit you are all correct about the options we had Kerry, Gore. Bush may have been the least of two evils.
2007-09-01 07:20:06 · update #1
It's going to be pretty hard for them to admit they were wrong as long as the only alternatives they see were Gore and Kerry.
It is possible that some might admit they were wrong if they look at what the Libertarian alternatives were, but for those that still vote according to the Lesser of Two Evils, I'd say they got it right anyway.
2007-08-31 11:13:40 · answer #1 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I can admit when I'm wrong and am perfectly willing to do so when I am. I admit that I voted for Bush twice. I don't admit that I was wrong though because the other choices were Al Gore - a delusional idiot, and John Kerry - a traitorous coward. I will admit that Bush may not be the best president we ever had but given the other choices there was no other choice.
2007-08-31 19:43:10 · answer #2 · answered by rick b 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I voted for him both times and the second time because he was the lesser of two evils.
I sincerely believe that if the Dems were in office since the lastelection this country would be in worse condition than we are now. While I do not agree with all that GW has done in the lines of border securty and illegal immigration, I do believe he has taken the best actions in Iraq and Afganistan and the economy on the national level.
The housing fiasco going on now is not his fault. It is the fault of the greedy lenders who convinced the gullable into taking out mortgages they could not afford after the rate started to adjust to buy a house they could not really afford or to go deeper in debt on their house to pay off credit cards etc then go right back into debt on them.
2007-08-31 23:39:18 · answer #3 · answered by Will Y 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you compare Bush to the total retard the Dems ran, only the Dems refuse to admit the best man won. But then being a Democratic voter is in the DSM IV as a mental illness.
2007-08-31 18:33:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am, but I didn't vote for him. I actually wasn't old enough to vote in the last presidential election but if I had been I would not have voted for Bush. I thought it was stupid how he won the primary because he was against gay marriage. McCain should have been the republican candidate in the first place.
2007-08-31 20:50:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, I would, but I think Kerry was at least as bad.
2007-08-31 19:56:36 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was the lesser of two evils.
2007-08-31 18:33:29 · answer #7 · answered by Colt A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but I wasn't dumb enough to vote for that clown.
I think everyone who did owes the entire world an apology though.
2007-08-31 18:13:36 · answer #8 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Sure.
2007-08-31 18:21:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dude you need to do better than this silly sh*it..........
2007-08-31 19:50:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋