Do you have any intelligent criticisms of the people running for President?

Question

Or is it just the ad-homimem troll stuff

Answer 1

Hillary and Obama are the least qualified. They have never managed anything. Never been a governor or mayor or CEO or Officer in the military like all the other candidates.

FACT

Answer 2

Tons. Hillary doesn't stand for the "ideals" she speaks of, as seen in her policies. Practically every Republican says that the war was a bad idea, yet give no explanation as to how they would remove the troops, just that we have to "see it to the end." Obama has a lot of ideals that can never come into fruition because of the environment of politics in the world today, but at least he holds to them. A great deal of the candidates are against equal rights when they tout gay marriage as a possibility, on both sides. No one can seem to find ground to agree on abortion, so both sides want a hardline stance rather than compromise. Almost everyone is embroiled in attacking their opponents rather than supporting their own views. And people decide to talk about backgrounds of each other more often than the policies that each of them support.

Those enough? I know I lack a lot of information, but I think this covers a good deal.

Answer 3

Other than Ron Paul, all the republicans want us to stay in Iraq, sorry but they are immediately not suitable to receive my vote. Hillary, I would rather not see another Clinton. Obama, too early to tell, I need to see more.

I hope somehow there is a Kucinich/Paul or Paul/Kucinich ticket. I would vote for that ticket. I want some real change, I want some accountability and both of those men, one from each party, make the most sense to me. They both seem to be apart from congress even though they are both members. I would love to see two guys who vote their beliefs become the executive branch. They both have the novel idea we should follow the constitution. Imagine that?

Answer 4

that could call for somebody to truthfully be cognizant of the topics and Congressman Paul's positions/philosophies. distinctive the persons who're severe of Ron Paul are media-inspired automatons, it particularly is unusual in view that the media easily ignores Ron Paul. i could be ashamed to confess that i could vote for any candidate in accordance with what I had heard or seen on television. Likewise, to be inspired by utilising polls which could be skewed in any direction the pollster needs is moronic. inspect Penn and Teller's video on YouTube (Penn and Teller safeguard Ron Paul vs. Luntz and Fox information)

Answer 5

Isn't there someone qualified who doesn't want the job who we can draft?
Someone smart enough but too honest to seek the presidency.

Too bad it's only the White House rascals that are throwing themselves out.

Answer 6

Only three candidates have ever managed people.

Cities, states, etc.

And those are all in the republican party. The rest are only paper pushers or paper chasers.

In Hillary's case papers magically disappear.

Answer 7

sure...this is an easy one. given the clintons..."legacy", why should i ignore it when considering hillary for president. the idea that she somehow...didnt know or wasnt invovled is pure pelosi spin...

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

Answer 8

Just against Obama thus far. I don't want a head of state that is willing to use nuclear force. The last thing we need is another Hiroshima.

Answer 9

I think all the candidates spend too much time trying to figure what people want them to say, instead of taking a real stand for something- and sticking by it.

Answer 10

In all honesty I don't think I've seen anything out of anybody on either side that makes me think we have a candidate ready for the oval office.