we had a few zealots the flew planes into buildings and blew them up,, did the guy who blew up the oklahoma building attack america, no he blew up a building,, just like these nutcases,, this isnt the 1st time it happened at those buildings and we didnt go to war with iraq then,,they were pent up zealots,, not an army, an army attacks,, zealots just blow up buildings
2007-08-31 07:39:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
but it happened before and we didnt go to war,, if some bomb my house would the pres send out the military to attack that guy,, no,,
2007-08-31 07:47:58 · update #1
wow, you are stupid. I guess we didn't attack Japan, we just dropped a few of our left over atomic bombs on them.. it wasn't like an army attached japan duhhheeee
2007-08-31 07:44:05 · answer #1 · answered by howie r 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was "attacked" by those "zealots" just as shurly as I was when attacked by the ones seeking to kill me personaly with their rocks and knives and AK47s... they were as much a part of the army of the enemy as if they had landed on our beaches in landing craft and assaulted MorHead City or Astoria... and any who attempt such attacks should be destroyed , preferably at their source, long before they are on our soil... unfortunatly it is too late... Bush is allowing them to flood in and overthrow us without so much as a shot... instead is waisting lives and amunition in a deliberatly mismanaged war"over their" to divert attention from the real invasion taking place right here.... and is takeing place all through the "western" world... England and The EU will fall before the US... but we will all be buried alive in out own soil... unless we start fighting back with full force right now.
2007-08-31 14:54:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Zealots blow up buildings and kill alot of innocent people and ruin a ton of lives.Attack does not mean just armies a person can attack another person,dogs can attack.Terrorists attack.
2007-08-31 14:46:13 · answer #3 · answered by Barbara D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because it wasn't just 2 buildings in New York. The carnage was spread out over 4 states.
Big difference.
2007-08-31 14:44:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So, "MR. MOM" I guess America said, OH WELL, THAT'S THE WAY THE COOKIE CRUMBLES. WE MUST HAVE DONE SOMETHING VERY BAD TO THOSE PEOPLE. and move on?
People from another country murder thousands of people ON AMERICAN SOIL, that is an ATTACK. duh
And no, we didn't go after IRAQ...sheesh. We went after AFGHANISTAN because that's where that moron who set it all up was!
You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you.
2007-09-01 02:41:16 · answer #5 · answered by AmericanPatriot 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we should have gone after Bin Laden and Al Queda. Crazy Bush got us into an unwinnable war with Iraq. It's sad.
2007-08-31 14:44:00 · answer #6 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
A pretty short sighted analysis, but of course it's fine for you to believe that.
2007-08-31 14:47:59 · answer #7 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So if a suicide bomber drove his car packed with explosives into your house whilst your wife and children were inside, you would not see that as an attack on you ? ,...interesting.
2007-08-31 14:46:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
we say America was attacked 'cause it was from overseas. some say America was behind it all. if it was bin laden,why are we fighting with Iraq. he's not from there.
2007-08-31 14:54:52 · answer #9 · answered by Deep Purple 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We. as a nation WERE attacked by terrorists. Period. Oklahoma was a terrorist attack by our own kind. A terrorist attack is a terrorist attack.
2007-08-31 14:46:26 · answer #10 · answered by Kaliko 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋