2007-08-31 05:40:00 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Loftitright-- surely you jest! ROFL!
2007-08-31 05:54:23 · update #1
Graig was presented at the time Hillary needed it to take the heat off of her fund raising crimes with Hsu and the Chinese. People talk about our debt to China, that is but a small part of it, Clintons have sold the political process to the chinese, and I am certain they are much richer personally for it.
If you or I did the things the clintons have done, we would be behind bars for life under the continuing criminal enterprise RICO statutes.
Graig, as stupid as I think he is, is a gnat on an elephants behind compared to the crimes hillary commits and walks away from.
These links take you to just the fund raising crimes she has committed, there are many more crimes this woman is guilty of or complicit in that we can explore shortly.
http://www.againsthillary.com/
http://www.israelated.com/node/22779
http://prorev.com/2007/08/incriminating-video-surfaces-in-hrc.htm
http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/08/28/clinton-experience-in-fundrais/
http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/clintcrimefamily.html
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53740
continuing criminal enterprise, look it up in Websters, there ia picture of the Clintons right next to the definition.
2007-08-31 12:39:47 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Clinton campaign may have been for purchasing a pardon, just like Billy sold them. How was Graig voting record on non Gay issues? Did someone wish to get him out of office. If he was a Dem this would be a non-issue.
2007-08-31 15:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, the Craig story has more legs. Already, the campaign story is fading away. Mostly because it's clear Sen. Clinton had no personal knowledge of a crime committed long ago and not very hotly pursued by law enforcement. Another reason is that she isn't the only one who received contributions from Hsu. All the Democrats who received campaign funds from him are giving that money to charity. That's about it for that story. I know the Hillary Haters are disappointed that this one isn't THE story to bring her down that they are all so desperately hoping for, but oh well.
2007-08-31 12:59:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
For those who are ignorant of the Clinton misconducts, she knowingly accepted campaign contributions from a known felon which is illegal to do. Further, her and her husband accepted campaign contributions from foriegn nationals in particular China. And low and behold, the Chinese were allowed to purchase missle technology from the Energy department under Bill's administratation.
I am sorry, but that sounds like the Chinese bought the technology with the campaign contributions.
What will Hillary sell the presidency for with contributions from a felon?
Oh and one more thing for you libs, isn't a person's sex life private and not for public scrutiny?
2007-08-31 13:11:55 · answer #4 · answered by Michael H 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
At this point Craig, has ruined his career and if he's indeed guilty, I say good riddance. We need to clean house and get rid of the law makers who are law breakers!
Anyone who is running for President needs to be closely scrutinized. Clinton, has many issues when it comes to campaign contributions and honest disclosure. She's more important. Craig, is now a has-been!
2007-08-31 12:58:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Or the GAO report, which states the President has failed 15 of the 18 benchmarks set for Iraq. How long did the Craig story sit, before somebody needed a smoke screen?
2007-08-31 13:09:11 · answer #6 · answered by Beardog 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The Repubs are throwing Craig under the bus, Hsu turned himself in, however the money issue will remain
2007-08-31 13:06:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, since there was no corruption (i.e., Clinton's campaign was the one to come to the press to talk about the problem, and they're resolving it exactly the way a Republican candidate resolved the same exact problem a year or two ago), I'd say the CRAIG (not Graig) story is more important, since he admitted to knowingly breaking the law.
2007-08-31 12:44:19 · answer #8 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 6⤊ 6⤋
To a Liberal, the Craig Story. To a Republican, neither of those. The military, the war in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and illegal alien trespassing is what is on the mind mostly. Gee, I wonder of the two, who wants to save their country from death more?
2007-08-31 12:55:35 · answer #9 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm not a republican, but I really don't care about trashing him... My concern is about the next elections and who is going to win.. I could careless what that idiot wants to do in the bathroom... There's more Clinton corruption stories? do tell...
2007-08-31 12:46:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋