who and why?
2007-08-31 03:02:22 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Ron Paul
He is one of the only candidates that was against the war from the get go (unlike many Democrats who voted for it and now act like they had nothing to do with it).
Hearing him speak, he clearly understands economics. Central planning, high taxes, and big government programs do not make a nation prosper. See Cuba, USSR, China (before they embraced capitalism).
And his long time views on personal freedom makes many liberals look like communists (especially those who voted for the PATRIOT Act).
2007-08-31 03:16:29 · answer #1 · answered by j-man 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We won't know that until the Nominating Conventions are over.
If I were voting in a Primary Election today: Mitt Romney.
In the General Election: Anyone but Hill and Billy.
Have you heard about the all purpose bumper sticker? It says "Run Hillary, Run. Democrats put it on the back bumper. Republicans on the front.
2007-08-31 03:13:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Right now I'm thinking I will vote for Barrack in the democratic primary, though I'm still open to changing my vote and Edwards is making a good effort to change it.
I would love to see Kucinich as a major candidate as he has the most passion for what he believes. Biden seems to have the most active campaign in actually trying to convince the voters that he is the best option for president, though I don't think I can trust him. (OR HILLARY).
2007-08-31 04:45:01 · answer #3 · answered by labken1817 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure who I'm voting for yet, but I do know there will be an (R) in front of their name.
I plan on voting Republican because I do not agree with a lot of the views of the Democrats.
Well, I guess if I had a choice, spite his immigration plan, I'd like to see McCain. Yes, he is registered as a Republican, but I think he's closer to the middle than any candidate from either party.
2007-08-31 03:07:51 · answer #4 · answered by Colonel 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
As far as the President is concerned, I'm in between voting for Ron Paul and whomever is running for President on the Libertarian party ticket.
2007-08-31 05:01:22 · answer #5 · answered by Blue Rose Thorn 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Edwards, because he has by far been the one candidate that has vocalized what the working person is gong through. Healthcare, wages, housing, alternative energy and equality are only addressed by the other candidates as a sidebar issue. I want someone who has been there done that, not one who read what it's like.
2007-08-31 13:18:22 · answer #6 · answered by kathie_lucas 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now I have 3 top candidates that make my rounds. Rudy Guliani, John MCcain., and Bill Richardson.
Only ones that seem to have any experience and that might get something done while in office!
2007-08-31 07:04:33 · answer #7 · answered by <Carol> 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul.
He is the only candidate that understands the proper roll of government. (Which happens to be almost no roll at all.)
The U.S. government needs a genuine shakeup. Other candidates talk about shaking things up, but if you listen to what they say, they are only interested in making small changes within the exsisting system. Ron Paul however, talks about eliminating the system. That's no small change. And I think that's exactly what America needs. A brand new start.
2007-08-31 03:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by Francis K 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hilllary
2007-08-31 05:01:42 · answer #9 · answered by xxxxx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The one who winds up as the Republican candidate...why? Because even if I have to hold my nose to vote, I don't want a democrat picking supreme Court nominees.
2007-08-31 03:06:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋