everyone has a right to their own opinion so why not respond with valid answers not abuse and name calling.
2007-08-31 00:59:43 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Because the questions are generally ridiculous and spiteful, that's why!
And no, I don't leave my child alone while I go 'boozing' before someone starts.
2007-08-31 01:06:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 7⤋
I am never nasty nor am I spiteful to a valid question.
However I do not suffer fools gladly and I will respond to kind with kind.
There have been a lot of spiteful ,callous and nasty questions that have been asked for no reason other than all of the above.
What is valid about that?
2007-09-01 01:44:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both sides of the fence are responsible for some unbelievably spiteful and unpleasant accusations but there are still some decent posts, even if they don't agree with one another.
The main difference, it seems to me, its that the 'antis' confine their abuse mainly towards the McCanns and the supporters confine their insults to the antis, whether the post was abusive or not.
I can think of 2 culprits on the pro side and I suspect they are reincarnations of Piltdown Man and Lettinitbe. No prizes for guessing who I mean!
2007-08-31 03:12:14 · answer #3 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
'Mcfans' as you have called them, are not all nasty in their responses. Don't tar everyone with the same brush, it works both ways you know. Have you ever considered the possibility that the 'antis' are the ones posting the vast majority of the questions on here, most of them provocative, nasty or just downright ridiculous!
2007-08-31 01:40:01 · answer #4 · answered by thebigkahuna 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
have a look through all the answers this thread and see which ones are nasty and provocative
compare and contrast the responses from Theo, Jack H and Filfilapoo114 and claire B- who are definately anti's
with the reasoned responses of firefoxy, steph j, sparki2005 and the bigkahuna - who are probably 'Mcfans' (as you called them)
I say 'probably' becasue they dont actually put their affiliation... they may just be reasonable people.
2007-08-31 02:20:23 · answer #5 · answered by SeabourneFerriesLtd 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Get out the violins. If they are putting forward valid questions they are dealt with in the same manner. In reality many of the questions can't be answered, or they are using the absense of information as proof, and are simply a way of attacking them.
The anti-McCanns are routinely accusing anyone who "defends" the McCanns, i.e. taking an opposing point of view, as being in favour of child neglect, as the 2 posters above me prove.
The very fact that you call people McFans says it all. I am no fan of theirs, think them guilty of neglect, but not murder.
2007-08-31 01:19:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I agree with Steph and some of the antis are downright wicked in some of their posts towards other members
Edit: Great Example Fillapoo whatever disgraceful and Theo!
2007-08-31 01:45:12 · answer #7 · answered by Cara C 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I agree but it cuts both ways and it depends what you are referring to as 'valid' questions. Fifilapoo114 for example just asked one that is just ridiculous and childish.
2007-08-31 01:25:08 · answer #8 · answered by *Sparki* 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is happening both sides ....
I believe we are all entitled to our opinions and abuse shows a complete disregard for everyone using this site..
2007-08-31 02:01:07 · answer #9 · answered by sammie 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They must know that the net is closing in on their heroes,they may also be afraid of voicing their own doubts,which they must be having now.
2007-08-31 08:57:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It looks like the freedom of free speech has gone out the window. Good point you made there.
2007-08-31 03:36:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋