2007-08-30 22:50:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
so far i have to disagree..im no nazi..but did you ever look at winston..he looked like a fat old lady..and hitler did win alot of medels fighting in world war one..im sure neither could actually fight physically well..but im leaning towards hitler..but who knows...
2007-08-30 22:56:46 · update #1
ok yankee...whats your source for your infor though?
2007-08-31 18:56:13 · update #2
This is a tough one, but here's what we know:
After the early 1930s, Hitler generally followed a vegetarian diet, and had several health problems possibly including IBS and an irregular heartbeat. He was a non-smoker.
Churchill's health was fragile, as shown by a mild heart attack he suffered in December 1941 at the White House. He was famous for smoking cigars.
Churchill was also a champion fencer in his youth.
Churchill, with his strength from eating meat coupled with coordination and speed as proven by his fencing record would clobber Hitler's vegetarian nonsmoking ***.
2007-08-30 23:11:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Churchill was a British Bulldog, Hitler was a Parkinsons riddled skiddish little man. Churchill would have flattened him.
Both had military experience, but Hitler only ever made it to corporal (he was a motorcycle messenger) Gerd Von Rundstedt openly called him the little corporal to his face. However, only a legendary and much loved German hero like Von Rundstedt could have gotten away with it; and it was a well known sore spot for Hitler.
2007-08-31 07:52:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Churchill
2007-08-31 05:53:32 · answer #3 · answered by Joyful97 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Churchill - Advantages
Trained at Sandhurst
Extensive military experience
Combative personality
Churchill - Disadvantages
15 years older than opponent
Obese
Smoker
Hitler - Advantages
Combat experience
Combative personality
15 years younger than opponent
Hitler - Disadvantages
Parkinson like symptoms since WW1
Meth addict due to treatment for above
Lack of self control ( rages, etc.)
*******Outcome*****
Churchill, KO Round 1,
The weak, shaky meth addict is not going to be much of a boxer.
2007-08-31 07:39:23 · answer #4 · answered by Michael J 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hitler was just a big bully like any other bully on the street. He could get everyone else to do bad things for him but if someone chased him down and grabbed hold of him he would probably cry like a little biotch.
2007-08-31 05:54:35 · answer #5 · answered by Michelle My Bell 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
in his twenties and thirties Churchill:
as a Lt of Heavy Calvary, Churchill rode with the 21st Lancers at Omdurman, when 250 British horsemen charged a gully filled with 3,000 Dervish fanatics....Churchill that day personally killed a dozen with his lance, saber and revolver...
broke out of a South African ( Boer) prison camp and snuck 400 miles across South Africa back to British lines
was ready to lead the defense of Antwerp in 1914 with a detachment of Royal Marines......
spent his years of political exile from 1917-1939 building brick walls and paths at his country house and sparring most days with his trainer
Churchill, KO first round
2007-08-31 10:55:15 · answer #6 · answered by yankee_sailor 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd have to go with Hitler, he's got military experience and was probably taught how to throw a mean hook in training camp.
2007-08-31 06:02:58 · answer #7 · answered by KayOne 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Churchill clearly especially after a bottle of whiskey.
2007-08-31 05:57:37 · answer #8 · answered by Theta40 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Churchill....all he would have to do is sit on Hitler.
2007-08-31 05:58:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
One on One? hm...I say Hitler would win
2007-08-31 06:38:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋