Bush all the way, but let me explain...
Bin Laden is a small time punk. The attacks on the twin towers were his biggest success. Now the US is stomping a mudhole in Iraq and Afghanistan - Iran might be next.
Bin Laden - two buildings, George Bush - two countries (and counting)
2007-08-30 22:48:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Bin Laden has. Without him, Bush would have happily strolled through 8 years as president without doing anything at all, good or bad. Remember, before September 11, he proposed an almost isolationist foreign policy, apart from being pro-free trade. During his debates with Gore, he said that America should be a humble nation, and should not engage in nation-building under any circumstances.
2007-08-31 06:19:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Thomas M 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
In a body count GW would win hands down. In fact he has probably been responsible for the deaths of more Americans than Bin Laden., never mind Iraqis and others.
2007-08-31 06:00:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ted T 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Really, it's the Democrats that have done more harn. The world is turning back to America because of the renewed threat from Russia.
2007-08-31 06:00:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
In my world Bin Laden.
2007-08-31 06:23:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you meant harm, it's bin Laden, then Bush.
If you meant harn, then you're on your own.
2007-08-31 05:46:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by angelpuppyeyes 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Neither has done any Harn!
2007-08-31 05:44:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I am not clear on what harn is. Is it like harness? As in harness power?
2007-08-31 05:43:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
It's not who broke the eggs. It's who's gonna eat the omlette, and the answer is the civilized people of the world after all the savages have been killed.
2007-08-31 05:50:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Neither! You have with your horrible English.
2007-09-04 02:15:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by johny0802 4
·
0⤊
0⤋