2007-08-30 20:26:51 · 5 answers · asked by Bern_CH 5 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Boats & Boating
So long as you don't pitch-pole in the roaring 40's, I think it'd outperform heavier monohull designs, if that's what you mean.
'Safety' is wrought from the captain and crew's application of maritime acumen and abilities, not simply design characteristics of the yacht's hull, seaworthiness notwithstanding.
Overall, I'd say, 'Safe, for Mariners. Iffy proposition for Boaters.'
That's the way I see it.
2007-08-30 21:27:45 · answer #1 · answered by omnisource 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's been done successfully. Why would you think it a problem?
Trimarans are wonderfully stable and seaworthy.
2007-08-30 20:41:14 · answer #2 · answered by bahbdorje 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no boat or ship is 100% safe at the horn. thats why they built the panama canal. its a place for only the highest skilled mainers and sturdy ships.
2007-08-31 04:40:51 · answer #3 · answered by windybrr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since most all tri== were not production made your at the mersey of the builder???An how good he built it.?I had 1 there more for shallow water not offshore?? I wouldn't if me>?
2007-08-31 07:31:40 · answer #4 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
any trip around the horn is extremely dangerous. a fiberglass boat is not the way to do it, i don't care if it's a 6-maran!
2007-08-31 02:58:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋